The greatest story in the world, period 1 (of 3) : $b [From the earliest times to A. D. 100]Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 1 (of 3) : $b [From the earliest times to A. D. 100]
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
There were several rival parties in Carthage itself, and it seems
likely that there was jealousy of Hannibal's great successes.
Whatever the reason, the help he expected was very long in coming.
He stayed on in Italy with his army which had been so victorious.
The Romans would not come to another fixed battle with him, but they
hovered about his army, continually harassing it. Probably it lost
much of its fighting force in this time of waiting. It was not until
nine years after Cannæ that Hannibal's brother, Hasdrubal, was sent
with an army to his help, and by that time the Romans had so
recovered their strength that they met and defeated, on the Metaurus,
this army of Hasdrubal's; and it was really this great battle that
settled the war. It left Hannibal helpless for any big fighting in
Italy. {175} It left the Romans free to make their power firm again
in Spain. They were so little troubled by the presence of Hannibal,
in his present condition, in Italy, that they again sent a force
oversea into Africa. This time their arms were completely successful
over the Carthaginians and their African allies. The Carthaginians,
in their alarm, recalled Hannibal, to see if his genius could save
them. But it was too late. He was defeated in the battle of Zama,
in 202 B.C., and therewith came the end of the Second Punic War.
Really it was the end of Carthage as a formidable rival to the power
of Rome. In the arrangements which followed she was compelled to
give up her fleet, to give up all her claims on Spain, and on the
islands in the Mediterranean, and to be content with her possessions
in Africa itself.
Again, Rome had won the last battle.
Why she did not meet her doom after Cannæ, we can never know. Had
Hannibal pressed forward after that victory the whole course of the
great story would probably have been quite different. To what extent
the hand of Providence interferes at such moments of the story as
these we cannot tell--or to what extent man is allowed to work out
his own fortunes without that correcting hand. Undoubtedly there are
certain moments when it looks very much as if Providence had actively
intervened; and perhaps, in our ignorance, we had better not attempt
to say more than that.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account