The greatest story in the world, period 1 (of 3) : $b [From the earliest times to A. D. 100]Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 1 (of 3) : $b [From the earliest times to A. D. 100]
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
You will understand, of course, what I mean when I talk of "the whole
world" at this point of the story, and what that Greek historian,
Polybius, of whom I told you in the last chapter, meant by it. He
knew, no doubt, that there was a great deal of the world, in the
sense of land inhabited by human beings, beyond the wide lands over
which the Roman power really did extend. But neither he nor any one
else in the Greek or Roman world of that day thought that these lands
and their inhabitants counted for anything. They did not matter.
These peoples were called barbarians. They were considered rather as
we consider the North American Indians or the negroes. They were far
more formidable to the Romans than either of these are to us, because
the people away to the east and north-east of Syria, to the north of
Asia Minor and Thrace and of Italy itself, all these had limitless
lands behind them, on the sides farthest {192} from the central power
of Rome, to retreat into when she came with any power against them.
For the most part they were peoples who led a wandering life. It was
no trouble to them to strike their tents and go back into the wilds.
But it was terrible trouble for the legions to follow them very far
into those wilds; and the legions could not easily force them to a
decided battle if they did follow them.
Therefore the Romans doubtless knew that however far they might push
out their power in the east and north there would always be peoples
on the edge of the lands which they could really make their own who
would be apt to give trouble and would require small campaigns to be
waged against them from time to time. Probably they made up their
minds to that. But inside that wide barbarian fringe, and with the
Atlantic Ocean on the west and the nearly uninhabited deserts of
Africa on the south--within the wide expanse of which these form the
boundary, the Roman power was such that if Rome said a thing had to
be done, there was no man who questioned it. Done that thing had to
be. That is what is meant by a phrase that you have most likely
heard, the "Pax Romana," the Roman peace. It meant the peace which
Rome could, and did, enforce within these regions under her power--a
peace that could not be broken because every man knew that whatever
she said was to be done, must be done. There was no help for it.
Of course the peace was not perfect, it was not untroubled. No peace
ever is. But it was peace of a kind that the world had never known
before. The whole world--the whole world that mattered--was for the
first time under one single authority. It was also for the last
time; for it is a condition that the {193} world has never been in
again since the break-up of the Roman power. So I think I was
justified in asking you to stop a moment in the course of the story
in order to consider the position of affairs to which it has brought
us. It is interesting, is it not?
* * * * *
[Sidenote: Mithridates]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account