The greatest story in the world, period 1 (of 3) : $b [From the earliest times to A. D. 100]Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 1 (of 3) : $b [From the earliest times to A. D. 100]
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
And as for Babylon itself, there can be little doubt that at this
time it was in the midst of troubles. It was pressed upon thus, as
we see, by the growing power of Egypt on the west. Then on the
eastern side it was continually being troubled by that powerful
nation, the Elamites, whose capital was Susa. I do not want to
bother you much about these Elamites, though their power was great
and their civilisation an old civilisation. They were important
enough to Babylon, because they were constantly giving trouble, very
much as the stronger African tribes gave trouble to the Egyptians.
But apart from this they do not occupy any very big part in the great
story. They were not exactly what we should call world-makers, and
it is only the world-makers that we are taking as the actors {88} in
our story. They came rather near being world-makers in the great
sense, for there was a moment when they seriously threatened to
subjugate Babylonia, but the Babylonians just succeeded in defeating
them.
And then, of course, there were the Assyrians in the north, already
quite independent in reality, though Babylon still claimed a
suzerainty over them.
So now continually, for hundreds of years, the story goes on
repeating itself in the same way over and over again. The Assyrians
begin to get more and more power in the east and they are constantly
coming into conflict with the Egyptians who are constantly fighting
to retain their hold on that Syria which the wars of the two Thothmes
had made an Egyptian province. Syria lies north of Palestine: and
Palestine, being nearer to Egypt, was still more insistently claimed
by the Egyptians as theirs. You may realise how difficult the
position was for these Semitic tribes in Syria and Palestine, between
the two empires. The tribes were not united among themselves, so
that we can easily imagine (and we know that it actually did so
happen) that they tried to save themselves by making alliances with,
or admitting themselves as subject to, now one of the big empires and
now the other. That is the way the story went for hundreds of years
there. The Children of Israel, as you know, were not in the
Palestine story at the moment. It was about 1500 B.C. that the very
great Pharaoh Thothmes III. came to the throne, at the time when the
Israelites were in the land of Goshen. It was not until two or three
hundred years later that Moses led them (in Exodus) into the
wilderness.
Let us give the date of 1250 B.C. to the Exodus. It will then be
about the year 1200, or a little before, {89} that the Israelites
must have made their way, conquering, across Jordan and into the land
of Canaan.
Now, how did it happen that a people thus still called the Children
of Israel could have become so numerous and so powerful as to be able
to win these victories?
[Sidenote: The promised land]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account