The greatest story in the world, period 1 (of 3) : $b [From the earliest times to A. D. 100]Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 1 (of 3) : $b [From the earliest times to A. D. 100]
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
Some hundred or two hundred years after the siege of Troy we find
certain colonies or cities of the Greeks founded along the western
shore of Asia Minor. The Greeks living in these cities were called
Ionians. Shortly before the coming of Cyrus, the all-conquering
Persian, those Ionians had been conquered by that king Crœsus of
Lydia whom we saw taking command of that ill-fated alliance formed
against Persia. The Persian had now, by the time, 500 B.C., to which
we have brought down the story, made himself master of all Asia
Minor. The Ionian cities had come under his dominance.
{129}
CHAPTER IX
THE GLORIOUS DAYS OF GREECE
It is amusing to stop now and then in the course of a story to wonder
how it would have gone if one or other of the events in it had
happened rather differently. Sometimes it seems as if just one event
turned the whole course of what happened afterwards.
So here in this great story of ours we may wonder what would have
happened to the world if the Persians, pushing their way westward,
had not come up against that strong wall of opposition which they
found in the Greek phalanx. There was no other power, so far as we
know, at this time, in the west, that was at all likely to be able to
stop them.
If we look at what happened in the more southward direction of their
advance, in Egypt, we shall perhaps be inclined to think that they
would not have gone very much farther westward than they did, for the
Egyptian story of that time shows that they were not able to
establish their power very securely in that country. For nearly
forty years after the Persian conquest of Egypt by Cambyses, the son
of Cyrus, Egypt was held as a province of Persia, but in 488 B.C. the
Egyptians made a successful revolt and threw off the Persian yoke for
a time. Three years later they were again subdued by Xerxes, who was
then king of Persia, but only fifteen years afterwards they were
{130} again revolting, and through the whole of that century, 500 to
400 B.C., they were continually rising against their Persian masters,
never quite succeeding in winning their freedom, but constantly
giving trouble, never completely subdued. It is evident that the
Persians, after their first and most effective conquest, never had a
very secure hold over the people of the Nile.
Then, if we turn to look at what was going on farther north, where
the Persian cavalry were coming up against that famous Greek phalanx,
we shall see good reason why the Persians were not able to give a
great deal of attention to making their position good in Egypt. The
wonder is that they should have found any forces at all to spare for
that enterprise.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account