The greatest story in the world, period 2 (of 3) : $b The further story of the Old World up to the discovery of the NewHutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 2 (of 3) : $b The further story of the Old World up to the discovery of the New
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
And now--to conclude the story of Spain, up to the year 1500 or so,
and the story of that long drawn-out crusade of eight centuries of
which she was the scene--it is remarkable that although the Moslems'
power had been restricted to the Kingdom of Granada as early as the
middle of the thirteenth century, it was not until nearly the close
of the fifteenth that their dominion in Spain was brought to an end
by the capture of Granada itself. And by this time the Christian
power in the country had been strengthened by the union of the
Kingdom of Aragon with that of Castile. This was brought about by
the marriage of Ferdinand, King of Aragon with Isabella, Queen of
Castile. Thus, with Granada now included in Christian Spain, we have
the boundaries of the country as they are to-day, except for a small
part of the little Kingdom of Navarre which lay south of the
Pyrenees. That final portion also will be annexed before many years
of the new century have gone.
And now Columbus is just coming back with the news of America. Spain
is about to enter on her conquests in the New World. A new day is
dawning.
{181}
CHAPTER XX
THE PLANTAGENETS IN FRANCE AND ENGLAND
If the kings of England after John had been content to acquiesce in
his giving up of practically all that were of value of his
possessions on the Continent, it is likely that they would have saved
much fighting and misery, both for the people of England and of the
Continent also.
It was not to be thought for a moment that they would so acquiesce,
however. It took the almost continual fighting of some 300 years to
effect that useful separation of England from the rest of Europe.
To understand the story we have to bear in mind that the character
and will of the king in those days were all-important for the
country. He could practically dictate what was to be done. He could
declare war and make peace.
And yet, remember this, even a king could not make war without money,
to pay and feed his troops and to get munitions of war and horses and
so on. The kings of England often found themselves in want of money
for their wars. They tried once or twice to impose, of their own
authority, a tax--over and above the taxes which had grown out of
ancient usage and were recognised as the king's right--to pay these
expenses, but the people and the barons always proved too strong for
the king when he attempted these exactions. If they did not actually
force him to give up the new tax, they at least compelled him to
accord them some further liberties and privileges in return for their
consenting to pay the extra contribution demanded of them. It was
largely in this way, {182} because of the necessity for money in
which the king found himself, that the "rights of the people," as we
call them, were conceded.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account