The greatest story in the world, period 2 (of 3) : $b The further story of the Old World up to the discovery of the NewHutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 2 (of 3) : $b The further story of the Old World up to the discovery of the New
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
Even in a story sketched in its most bare outlines, as is this, and
told with as few names and as few dates as possible, it seemed
necessary to mention some of these glorious artists and to realise
that the end was at hand of those Middle Ages which have also been
called Dark Ages, because of the dark ignorance and barbarity in
which humanity at that time was plunged. Some of the goldsmith's and
silversmith's work of the day was very finely executed, and many of
the finest painters and sculptors themselves did not scorn to work at
the jeweller's craft. But the real glory which lightens the general
darkness of the Middle Ages, is the splendour of the
architecture--the cathedrals and churches, the public buildings and
the palaces of the great nobles. The richness of the church
architecture in our own country we have shortly noticed already, and
all over the world beautiful and noble structures were raised in
those troubled ages when most of the arts were little studied.
Generally the building is in one or other of the successive varieties
of the Gothic style. In Spain we see many traces of the Eastern
taste of the Moslems for towers and domes and "minarets," as those
slender towers with their balconies for prayer are called. Asiatic
influence is found, though far less often, in some Italian buildings
also.
[Sidenote: The nations in 1500 A.D.]
Now we may do well to take a look round the world, the scene of this
greatest of all stories, and see to what condition we have traced its
progress at this point of time--say A.D. 1500 or a year or two before
or after {231} that central date. We see, regarding it as a whole,
that the nations have been engaged, after the break-up that followed
the ruin of the Roman Empire, in framing their territories into
something like the shape which we may find on the map now. And
generally they have followed the same course, have gone through the
same struggles and changes, in their way towards assuming that shape.
For at first they split up into a number of small independent bodies,
each under the rule of a lord. Nominally there was an overlord, but
his sovereignty for a while was not very effective. It was but
gradually that he made it real. Some of the nations differed from
others in their local conditions. Thus Spain, rather cut off by the
Pyrenees from the main story, had its own peculiar difficulties with
the Moslems. The sovereignty of Italy, with its five principal
States, was complicated by the claims of Pope and Emperor, of Guelph
and Ghibelline and of the different city States asserting each its
independence. But on the whole, what we are able to see is a
tendency for the sovereign overlord gradually to make his power good
over the lesser lords, and so to produce something like those
national unities which we find now.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account