The greatest story in the world, period 2 (of 3) : $b The further story of the Old World up to the discovery of the NewHutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 2 (of 3) : $b The further story of the Old World up to the discovery of the New
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
It began with even brighter promise than the first; for whereas
knights were the leaders of the former, two kings, the King of France
and the King of Germany, put themselves, in person, at the head of
the second. But in spite of the fair promise the main result was
failure. It was the occasion of some successful enterprises by the
way; and we may note that whereas the first Crusade had been almost
entirely French and Norman, English, as well as Germans, took part in
the {137} latter. Also, whereas the route taken by the first had
been entirely overland, through Hungary, some of the second
Crusaders, from England and Flanders, made their way to the East by
sea.
In course of that sea voyage some of the soldiers of the Cross,
landing up the Tagus from their ships, took the city of Lisbon from
the Moors, and this capture was the beginning of the little kingdom
of Portugal. Thence the force went upon its voyage eastward.
[Sidenote: The Wends]
In the north of Germany some of the forces assembled for the Crusade
never went very far from home. They seem to have received the
permission of the Pope to fight against a tribe, called Wends, on
their eastern frontier, instead of against the Saracens; and seeing
that these Wends were heathen, this might perhaps be regarded in the
light of a Holy War no less than that in Asia Minor.
It is possible to state very shortly the achievements of the forces
that did get to the East--they achieved nothing at all. The two
kings seem to have been jealous of each other. They acted
separately, with no joint action, and were defeated in turn. They
returned home with no glory, and left the Kingdom of Jerusalem in a
worse plight than before, just because of their failure, after such
preparations and expectations. The Saracen might well think that if
this was all that the West, under its two greatest kings, could do,
they need not be much afraid.
Therefore they pressed continually closer and closer about the
Kingdom of Jerusalem. The Christians held their own, with a success
that is rather surprising, until the reign of the great Saladin.
Until his reign the Saracens in Asia Minor and in the country east of
the Jordan had not acted in unison with the Saracens in Egypt.
Saladin brought all together; so that now the situation of this Latin
Kingdom of Jerusalem was even worse than we saw the position {138} of
Palestine to be in the very early days of the great story. Then it
had lain between the two powerful empires of Egypt and Babylonia.
Now it was lying like an island in the midst of a sea of enemies all
fighting, not against each other, but united to fight against it.
And then this Jerusalem, taken from the Saracens in 1099, was by them
retaken in 1187.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account