The greatest story in the world, period 3 (of 3) : $b The development of the modern worldHutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 3 (of 3) : $b The development of the modern world
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
Some such blend of motives seems to have driven him to be constantly
seeking occasions to put his armies in the field. He found such
occasion first against Russia--against Russia, and in support of the
Turk!
It was a curious reversal of all that seems right and natural, though
already we have seen the Turk strangely and occasionally allied with
one Christian power against another. But generally we have found the
Turk regarded as the common foe against whom all Christendom must
combine. The truth is that the Turk was no longer at this time the
power to be dreaded that he had been. He had for long been standing
on the defensive in Europe, trying, but on the whole rather failing,
to hold what he had won.
And on the other hand Russia, now the Turk's principal foe, had
become so powerful that all Europe was afraid of her, afraid of her
upsetting that "balance of power" in Europe of which we now begin to
hear a good deal. In particular, she was reaching down to get
Constantinople for her port; and France, and other nations of Europe,
conceived it their business to see that she did not get it, with all
the increase of power that it would bring her.
[Sidenote: The Crimean War]
To that opinion Napoleon III., a man of character and abilities which
have puzzled all historians, but certainly a man of much astuteness,
had brought opinion in Great Britain. Great Britain was beginning,
on her own account, to fear the Russian push down towards the
northern bounds of her Indian possessions. And so now, that is to
say, most particularly in 1854, {203} we see another reversal,
another happening rather different from all that the story has been
wont to show us. For we see now those old enemies, England and
France, in friendly alliance together, partners in the very fruitless
enterprise known as the Crimean War. It was fought with much
bloodshed and misery and cost to all three nations involved, and
ended in a barren victory for the English and French.
Possibly it did check the Russians in their movement towards
Constantinople, possibly it did something to maintain that much
desired balance of power; but of positive result there was little or
even none.
Nor did the Crimean War put a final end to the troubles between
Russia and Turkey. Russia, as the great Slav power, was sure to find
herself opposed to Turkey, who ruled over the Slavs in portions of
the Balkans. There was war between them again, thirty years later,
in 1877, but yet again its result solved no problems.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account