The greatest story in the world, period 3 (of 3) : $b The development of the modern worldHutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 3 (of 3) : $b The development of the modern world
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
The real truth about his subjects was, though Louis did not know it,
that their state was as utterly miserable as that of human beings
well could be. They were ground down not only by their local lords
and nobles, but also by the heavy taxes that they had to contribute
in order that the king should be able to keep up this magnificence in
his court, to pay so large an army and to wage costly wars. It was
no part of the French constitution, as of the English, that the money
supplied for the purposes of government should be voted by the
Parliament. It is true that English kings often tried, sometimes
successfully, to extract such money without a vote of Parliament; but
at least the law was there, for the people to appeal to, as a great
fact in the English constitution. Its existence made a very great
difference.
Thus, while all went so gloriously with France upon the surface and
in the upper ranks, below, in those foundations on which, after all,
this splendid edifice was based, there was misery and increasing
poverty--poverty which could have only one end, that there would be
no money to pay for the wars and for the magnificence, and misery so
intolerable that men would rise and revolt against their conditions
of life, no matter how many should perish in the revolution. We,
now, knowing what actually did come to pass, can see how the forces
were slowly accumulating which would {98} bring it all about. But
from the eyes of men of that time, living in the midst of it, the end
was hidden; and most of all, as we may suppose, hidden from that
resplendent monarch himself.
We may observe as curious that in the varying struggle that we have
seen going on between France, Spain, England, and Holland during this
half-century, we hear so little of Germany taking a hand. Certain of
the German States did, as a matter of fact, play some small part,
directly, in that struggle, either as Protestants in alliance with
the Protestant Dutch, or later in their own defence against the
claims of the French king; but the reason why Germany, as a whole,
took no continuous or large share, by direct action at the centre,
was in the first place that her power was much broken up--she was
split into a number of separate States, with no strong central
authority to combine their action; secondly, that indirectly she
really was playing a part that was important--serving as a guard to
keep back the Turk on the south-eastern corner of Europe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account