The greatest story in the world, period 3 (of 3) : $b The development of the modern worldHutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 3 (of 3) : $b The development of the modern world
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
The Peace of Utrecht had indeed included in its provisions a
settlement between England and France; but within a few years war
broke out again in Europe, which involved both these countries, and
again it was war over the succession to thrones. There was war over
the succession to the throne of Poland, to the throne of Austria,
and, although it is not written of {115} by historians as a war of
succession, it really was a small war of the same kind in which
England very soon found herself engaged in Scotland.. And, as ever
of old, France and her Catholic king sided with the Scottish
Catholics against the English Protestant king. The Court of France
had, as we have noted, given welcome and shelter to the son, by his
second marriage, of James II., who had a claim by birth to the
English Crown.
[Sidenote: Hanoverian English Kings]
But by a recent law of England no Catholic could succeed to the
throne. The Act of Settlement gave the Crown of England to George,
Elector of Hanover, who was a Protestant and son of a Protestant
grand-daughter of James I. It was thus that the Hanoverian dynasty,
represented by our present King George V., attained the throne of
England. Until Queen Victoria's accession, the sovereignty of
Hanover, which became a kingdom when the Bourbon king was restored to
the throne of France, also belonged to the King of England. But the
laws of Hanover did not recognise succession through the female line,
or admit of a queen as ruler; and therefore the two Crowns were
separated when Victoria became sovereign of England.
The son of James II. came over to Scotland in 1715 and raised a
revolt there, with the aid of some of the Highland clans; but this
rising, known in history, from its date, as "The Fifteen," was easily
put down and made no abiding mark on the story.
The next, which really was of some importance, of the wars of
succession was that waged about the throne of Poland. It was a
throne, as we have seen, in frequent dispute, but generally the
trouble was fought out between Russia, Sweden, and Poland itself,
with eastern German States taking some hand in it. Usually these
German States acted as a kind of buffer between that particular
trouble and the West of Europe, {116} rather as Austria, southward,
acted as a buffer for the West against the Turk. But now the King of
France was drawn into the fight, because he had married a daughter of
the Leszynska whom Charles of Sweden had made King of Poland for a
few years before the disastrous overthrow of the Swedes at Pultowa.
Russia supported the cause of a rival candidate to the throne, and
Leszynska and his French allies were defeated. The chief importance
of this war of the Polish succession, for the general story, is that
it resulted in a large increase of Russia's power over Poland. The
successive rulers of Russia began to be more and more fully
recognised as the heads of the Slav people and the supreme upholders
of the Greek Church.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account