The greatest story in the world, period 3 (of 3) : $b The development of the modern worldHutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 3 (of 3) : $b The development of the modern world
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
But no French force appeared. Probably France had all her available
armies fully engaged. Charles Edward did not show determination. He
went back to Edinburgh, and the clans, held together by no central
authority, but only by their sympathy with the Scottish royal family
of Stuart, dispersed to their Highland homes. For a while the
Pretender played the king in Edinburgh, but at length a strong
English force under the Duke of Cumberland was sent to Scotland. A
decisive engagement was fought on the wild moor of Culloden, near
Inverness. It settled for all time the fate of the Stuart dynasty,
and set the Hanoverians firmly on the throne of England. The clans
which had arisen for the Stuarts in the previous attempt by the Old
Pretender in "the {121} Fifteen" had suffered slight punishment at
the hands of the victorious English. After "the Forty-five," on the
contrary, their punishment was cruelly severe; but it had at least
the effect of quelling their spirit so that they did not imperil the
peace of the realm again.
[Sidenote: Ireland's misfortunes]
At the same moment, towards the middle of this eighteenth century,
Ireland was in terrible suffering also. In 1739 had happened her
worst famine, due to failure of the potatoes on which most of the
people depended, almost entirely, for their livelihood. It was
estimated that no less than one-fifth of the population actually
died, and there can be no doubt that the effect of that starvation on
the survivors must have been to weaken the stock for more than one
generation.
And we are obliged to confess, with shame, that England's dealing
with Ireland during all that half-century was as cruel and selfish as
it was stupid and short-sighted. There was a moment when it seems as
if the people of the smaller island were anxious for union with the
greater; but that union was opposed by a section of the English
themselves--especially the powerful section interested in the trade
of wool with the continent of Europe. A law passed as far back as
the second half of the seventeenth century prohibited the Irish from
exporting cattle. Consequently they had largely devoted their
excellent pasture to producing sheep, for the wool. The English wool
traders wished to keep this profitable commerce to themselves. To
attain that selfish end they opposed the proposed union, which
presumably would have put the Irish wool producers on the same
footing as the English. Further, under William III., they succeeded
in passing through Parliament a bill prohibiting the Irish from
either making up their home-grown wool or from exporting it.
{122}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account