The greatest story in the world, period 3 (of 3) : $b The development of the modern worldHutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
History
The greatest story in the world, period 3 (of 3) : $b The development of the modern world
Hutchinson, Horace G. (Horace Gordon)
World history
The citizens of Massachusetts refused to obey the enactments of the
Governor, and all the colonies in America sooner or later came to the
support of Massachusetts. And that is no matter for our wonder,
seeing that they must have felt that what was done to Massachusetts
to-day might be done to them to-morrow. They must quickly have
realised that their best hope of liberty lay in opposing a united
front to the servitude that threatened them. It might seem but a
slender hope; yet we may remember that those colonists of a new world
were far more apt to make {142} good fighters than agriculturists or
townsfolk in a long settled land. They were still surrounded by
hostile tribes of Red Indians. Many of themselves, and most of their
forefathers, must have lived with rifle ever ready at hand, for
protection against sudden attack, while they went about their tasks
of peace. They were doubtless quick-witted, as men needs must be who
are constantly facing new conditions. They were tough, determined
men, and in their struggle to be free they found a man to lead
them--George Washington.
Of their tough quality the British soldiers made experience in the
first serious clash of arms at Bunker's Hill. I cannot tell you, in
a story of barest outlines like this, the details of the long
drawn-out fighting, how the cause of the colonists' freedom seemed
now and again all but lost, how the fortunes of the war went this way
and that. For its changes were scarcely less remarkable than those
of the Seven Years' War in Europe. The quality that served the
colonists best and enabled them to win through was that essentially
British quality of refusing to believe themselves defeated. They
endured with an extraordinary steadfastness and they recovered
themselves when beaten to the ground with a marvellous resilience.
Even after fighting had begun, a reconciliation might have been made
had the counsels of Lord Chatham prevailed at home. George
Washington was representative of the great landowners of Virginia.
By their traditions, and also owing to the fact that their state lay
far south of that Massachusetts which was the immediate sufferer by
the British tyranny, the Virginians clung more closely and longer to
the mother country than any of the other colonial children. But
their clinging was of no use. Chatham's good counsel was rejected.
Washington, as leader of the nation in war, was probably the more
looked up to {143} because he had tried so hard for peace. His face
now was set as firmly towards the prosecution of the war as it had
been towards peace while any hope of favourable peace was left. And
every year of the war's duration revealed more and more his rare
character for wisdom, determination, and moderation.
[Sidenote: Course of the War]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account