Orators -- Greece; Oratory, Ancient; Speeches, addresses, etc., Greek -- History and criticism
§§ 203-205, recapitulation; §§ 206-212, further incrimination of
Demosthenes, and §§ 213-214, of Ctesiphon. §§ 215-229, chiefly
refutation of charges against Aeschines. §§ 230-259, further general
discussion of the illegality of the measure and the unworthiness
of Demosthenes. The final appeal to the past—‘Think you not that
Themistocles and the heroes who fell at Marathon and Plataea, and the
very graves of our ancestors, will groan aloud if a crown is to be
granted to one who concerts with the barbarians for the ruin of Greece?’
ends abruptly and grotesquely with an invocation to ‘Earth and Sun and
Virtue and Intelligence and Education, through which we distinguish
between the noble and the base.’
It reminds us strangely of the invocations put into the mouth of
Euripides by Aristophanes.[298]
CHAPTER IX
DEMOSTHENES
§ 1. _Introduction_
The art of rhetoric could go no further after Isocrates, who, in addition
to possessing a style which was as perfect as technical dexterity could
make it, had imparted to his numerous disciples the art of composing
sonorous phrases and linking them together in elaborate periods. Any
young aspirant to literary fame might now learn from him to write fluent
easy prose, which would have been impossible to Thucydides or Antiphon.
If the style seems on some occasions to have been so over-elaborated that
the subject-matter takes a secondary place, that was the fault not so
much of the artist as of the man. Isocrates never wrote at fever-heat;
his greatest works come from the study; he is too reflective and
dispassionate to be a really vital force.
With Demosthenes and his contemporaries it is otherwise; they are men
actively engaged in politics, actuated by strong party-feeling, and
swayed by personal passion. This was the outcome of the political
situation: just as feeling was strong in the generation immediately
succeeding the reign of the oligarchical Thirty at Athens, so now, when
Athens and the whole of Greece were fighting not against oligarchy but
the empire of a sovereign ruler, the depths were stirred.
A new feature in this period is the publication of political speeches.
From the time of the earliest orator—Antiphon—the professional
_logographoi_ had preserved their speeches in writing. The majority of
these were delivered in minor cases of only personal importance, though
some orations by Lysias and others have reference indirectly to political
questions.
Another class of speeches which were usually preserved is the
_epideictic_—orations prepared for delivery at some great gathering, such
as a religious festival or a public funeral. Isocrates was an innovator
to the extent of writing in the form of speeches what were really
political treatises; but these were only composed for the reader, and
were never intended to be delivered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account