Orators -- Greece; Oratory, Ancient; Speeches, addresses, etc., Greek -- History and criticism
The orator himself must have attached great importance to this speech
as an exposition of his policy, for he appears to have published two
recensions of it. Both are preserved in different families of MSS. The
shorter text contained in S (_Parisinus_) and L (_Laurentianus_) omits
many phrases and even whole passages which occur in the other group. It
is believed that the shorter is the final form in which Demosthenes
wished to preserve the speech.[319]
The _Fourth Philippic_ contains the suggestion that Athens should make
overtures to the Persian king for help against Philip. The speech is
probably a forgery, but one of a peculiar kind. About a third of the text
consists of passages taken directly from the speech _On the Chersonese_,
and one division (§§ 35-45) is in favour of a distribution of the Theoric
Fund, which is quite opposed to the policy of the _Olynthiacs_ and the
Chersonese speech. On the other hand, some passages are in a style and
tone quite worthy of Demosthenes, and consistent with his views. There
can be little doubt that we have here a compilation from actual speeches
of Demosthenes, expanded by a certain amount of rhetorical invention.
The ‘answer to Philip’s letter’ and the speech περὶ συντάξως are, on the
other hand, simple forgeries. This concludes the list of the _Philippic_
speeches.
Our record of Demosthenes’ public speeches ceases with the _Third
Philippic_, at the moment when his eloquence had reached its greatest
height. The great speeches belong to the years of opposition; now, after
eleven years of combat, he had established himself as chief leader of the
assembly. He spoke, no doubt, frequently and impressively, but, engaged
in important administrative work, he had no leisure or need for writing.
The years 340-338 B.C. were a time of vigorous revival for Athens. For
a short but brilliant period it seemed that the city-state might emerge
triumphant from the struggle against monarchy. Enthusiasm inspired the
patriotic party to noble efforts. Euboea was removed from Philip’s
influence, and Athens inaugurated a new league, including Acarnania,
Achaea, Corcyra, Corinth, Euboea, and Megara. Philip himself suffered a
check before Byzantium, which had appealed to Athens for help, and had
not called in vain.
In internal affairs, a new trierarchic law not only increased the
efficiency of the fleet, but abolished a great social grievance by making
the burden of trierarchy fall on all classes in just proportion to their
means, whereas hitherto the poorer citizens had suffered unduly. A still
greater reform was the execution of the project, so long cherished, for
applying the Theoric Fund to the expenses of war (339 B.C.). In 338 B.C.
Lycurgus was appointed to the Ministry of Finance, an office which he was
to fill with exceptional efficiency for twelve years to come.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account