Orators -- Greece; Oratory, Ancient; Speeches, addresses, etc., Greek -- History and criticism
Hyperides[324] affirms that Demosthenes began by admitting the receipt of
the money; but he afterwards denied it, declaring that he was ready to
suffer death if it could be proved that he had received it.[325] It was
certainly Demosthenes who proposed that the Areopagus should investigate
the affair.
Two details in the case give rise to perplexity: the fine inflicted—two
and a half times the amount involved—was light, considering that the law
demanded ten-fold restitution; secondly, it is difficult to see when
Demosthenes can have received the money. Harpalus could not pay him at
the time of his escape, or indeed at any time subsequent to his arrest,
for he did not take the money to prison with him. It seems improbable
that the money should have been paid earlier, for Demosthenes was acting
against Harpalus all the time. Professor Butcher supposed that payment
might have been made when Demosthenes resisted the surrender of Harpalus
to Alexander.[326]
Two theories have been proposed with a view to the complete or partial
exculpation of the orator—one, that he was absolutely innocent, but
became the victim of a combination of his political enemies, the extreme
patriots, who were dissatisfied with his moderate policy, and his ancient
foes the Macedonian party. The other view is that he received the money
and spent it, or intended to spend it, on secret service of the kind on
which every State spends money, though it is generally impossible to
give a detailed account of such expenses. Even if he could not prove
such a use, the offence of receiving bribes was a venial one, as even
his prosecutor Hyperides admits, if they were not received against the
interests of the State. In Demosthenes’ favour we have the late evidence
of Pausanias, who affirms that an agent of Harpalus, when examined by
Alexander with regard to this affair, divulged a list of names which did
not contain that of Demosthenes.
A minor charge of bribery is brought by Dinarchus, who asserts that
Demosthenes received 300 talents from the Great King to save Thebes in
335 B.C., but sacrificed Thebes to his own avarice because he wished
to keep ten talents which had been promised to the Arcadians for their
assistance. The story is ridiculous.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account