Orators -- Greece; Oratory, Ancient; Speeches, addresses, etc., Greek -- History and criticism
_Against Pancleon_ (Or. xxiii.), date uncertain.—Pancleon, accused on
some unknown charge, and supposed by the prosecutor to be a _metoecus_,
has put in a plea that he is a Plataean citizen and therefore not
amenable to the law under which he was indicted. He turns out after all
to be a runaway slave.
These last two speeches consist almost entirely of narrative.
_Spurious or Doubtful Speeches_
_Against Andocides_ (Or. vi.), 399 B.C.—It is generally believed that
this speech is not by Lysias, the most serious argument being that the
writer of it is a blunderer. As Jebb points out, he makes at least three
damaging admissions calculated seriously to injure his own case. It may,
however, really be a speech delivered against Andocides. It contains some
statements which do not agree with Andocides’ own admissions, but, as
we have seen, it cannot be proved that Andocides was always veracious.
On the ground of general agreement with Andocides’ statements we may
believe that it was composed by some contemporary orator, and not, as has
been sometimes asserted, by a late Sophist. It may have been actually
delivered at the trial of Andocides in 399 B.C.
* * * * *
_Eroticus._—Phaedrus, in the dialogue of Plato which bears his name,
reads aloud a speech of Lysias which Socrates criticizes.
If Plato could be taken literally, we should believe that what is read
was the authentic work of Lysias; but Plato is if anything too emphatic
in his attempts to produce this illusion, and most readers will probably
be left with the impression that Plato is following his usual custom; he
tries to give his myths the solemnity of fact, and what he produces here
is an imitation too close to be called a parody. We may compare Plato’s
reproduction of Aspasia’s oration in the _Menexenus_.
* * * * *
The speech _To his Companions_ (Or. viii.) cannot reasonably be
attributed to Lysias, and indeed is so trivial that it can hardly be the
work of any self-respecting forger. It is probably to be regarded as a
declamatory exercise.
The speaker complains that his friends have slandered him by asserting
that he forced his company on them; they have sold him an unsound horse,
and accused him of inducing others to slander them. He therefore abjures
their friendship.
* * * * *
Extracts from six lost speeches are preserved by quotation in various
writers:
_Against Cinesias_ (Athenaeus, xiii. 551 D); _Against Tisis_ (Dion.,
_de Demos._, ch. xi.); _For Pherenicus_ (Dion., _de Isaeo_, ch. vi.);
_Against the Sons of Hippocrates_ (_ibid._); _Against Archebiades_
(_ibid._, ch. x.); _Against Aeschines_ (Athenaeus, xiii., 611 E-612
C).[152]
The fragments of other speeches, in Suidas, Harpocration, and others, are
negligible.
CHAPTER V
ISAEUS
§ 1
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account