The Greek Philosophers, Vol. 1 (of 2)Benn, Alfred William
Philosophy
The Greek Philosophers, Vol. 1 (of 2)
Benn, Alfred William
Philosophy, Ancient
compass, is in power and preciousness supreme.[192]
Let us now see how he carries this passionate enthusiasm for knowledge
into the humblest researches of zoology:—
Among natural objects, some exist unchanged through all eternity,
while others are generated and decay. The former are divinely
glorious, but being comparatively inaccessible to our means of
observation, far less is known of them than we could wish; while
perishable plants and animals offer abundant opportunities of study to
us who live under the same conditions with them. Each science has a
charm of its own. For knowledge of the heavenly bodies is so sublime
a thing that even a little of it is more delightful than all earthly
science put together; just as the smallest glimpse of a beloved
beauty is more delightful than the fullest and nearest revelation of
ordinary objects; while, on the other hand, where there are greater
facilities for observation, science can be carried much further; and
our closer kinship with the creatures of earth is some compensation
for the interest felt in that philosophy which deals with the divine.
Wherefore, in our discussions on living beings we shall, so far as
possible, pass over nothing, whether it rank high or low in the scale
of estimation. For even such of them as displease the senses, when
viewed with the eye of reason as wonderful works of Nature afford an
inexpressible pleasure to those who can enter philosophically into
the causes of things. For, surely, it would be absurd and irrational
to look with delight at the images of such objects on account of our
interest in the pictorial or plastic skill which they exhibit, and
not to take still greater pleasure in a scientific explanation of
the realities themselves. We ought not then to shrink with childish
disgust from an examination of the lower animals, for there is
something wonderful in all the works of Nature; and we may repeat
what Heracleitus is reported to have said to certain strangers who
had come to visit him, but hung back at the door when they saw him
warming himself before a fire, bidding them come in boldly, for
that there also there were gods; not allowing ourselves to call any
creature common or unclean, because there is a kind of natural beauty
about them all. For, if anywhere, there is a pervading purpose in the
works of Nature, and the realisation of this purpose is the beauty of
the thing. But if anyone should look with contempt on the scientific
examination of the lower animals, he must have the same opinion about
himself; for the greatest repugnance is felt in looking at the parts
of which the human body is composed, such as blood, muscles, bones,
veins, and the like.[193] Similarly, in discussing any part or organ
we should consider that it is not for the matter of which it consists
that we care, but for the whole form; just as in talking about a house
it is not bricks and mortar and wood that we mean; and so the theory
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account