The Greville Memoirs, Part 2 (of 3), Volume 1 (of 3): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1837 to 1852Greville, Charles
History
The Greville Memoirs, Part 2 (of 3), Volume 1 (of 3): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1837 to 1852
Greville, Charles
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901
On Tuesday last all was harmony in the House of Commons. Peel
made a speech, in which he announced his disposition to come to a
compromise, and settle all the Irish questions. Lord John
answered in a corresponding strain of conciliation, and it was
generally understood that everything should be quietly settled,
not, however, to the satisfaction of the Tory tail, much growling
being heard, both in the newspapers and among the low retainers
of the party. (Stanley told somebody, who told me, that he
thought this the best speech he ever heard Peel make.) But on
Friday night this serene sky was overcast with clouds, and all is
thrown into doubt and difficulty again. They are quarrelling
about the qualification, and angry words were bandied about.[8]
O'Connell and Sheil were abusive, though Peel and Lord John both
kept their tempers. It is supposed that the Tory party have been
so urgent, that Peel is obliged to take up this ground. When they
have gone so far towards a settlement, it is probable that some
mode will be hit upon for arranging the difficulty. The mob of
Tories would be rejoiced to see everything fall to the ground.
'Thank God,' said one the other night, after the renewal of
hostilities, 'there is an end of compromise.' I am disposed on
the whole (but very imperfectly informed) to think that John
Russell is right and Peel wrong, and that the former has made all
the concessions that ought to be required of him and that he can
afford to make.
[8] [The measure before the House was the Irish Municipal
Corporation Bill.]
June 7th, 1838 {p.101}
Walked with Mulgrave[9] (whom I met at Brooks's), and asked him
to tell me candidly who was in the right about the qualification,
John Russell or Peel? He said, 'talking openly to you, I don't
mind saying both are a little in the wrong; but the fact is, the
other party do not know what would be the practical effect of the
qualification they require, and when that is made clear to them,
in Dublin particularly' (and he mentioned some numbers and
details I don't exactly recollect), 'I think they will see the
necessity of altering their opinions.' He then talked of the
political effect of settling these questions as clearing away the
obstacles which now stand in Peel's way, and said he thought it
would eventually end in some sort of amalgamation of parties.
This I was surprised to hear from him, and told him that it
appeared to me quite impossible. But it is clear enough that it
is the intention of the Government, at all events, to settle the
questions, and if the Opposition will not give way, they will.
They are quite right, for it is a great thing to get the
principle admitted and to have corporations established; and if
upon trial it is found that there is an undue preponderance cast
into either scale, it will be good ground for proposing an
alteration of the law.
[9] [Lord Mulgrave, afterwards Marquis of Normanby, was at
this time Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account