The Greville Memoirs, Part 2 (of 3), Volume 1 (of 3): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1837 to 1852Greville, Charles
History
The Greville Memoirs, Part 2 (of 3), Volume 1 (of 3): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1837 to 1852
Greville, Charles
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901
Lord Fitzroy gave me an account of the battle of Salamanca,
exactly corresponding with that which the Duke himself gave me
last year at Burghley, but with some additional details. They
were going to dine in a farmyard, but the shot fell so thick
there that the mules carrying the dinner were ordered to go to
another place. There the Duke dined, walking about the whole time
munching, with his field-glass in his hand, and constantly
looking through it. On a sudden, he exclaimed, 'By G--, they are
extending their line; order my horses.' The horses were brought
and he was off in an instant, followed only by his old German
dragoon, who went with him everywhere. The aides-de-camp followed
as quickly as they could. He galloped straight to Pakenham's
division and desired him immediately to begin the attack.
Pakenham said, 'Give me your hand, and it shall be done.' The
Duke very gravely gave him his hand, Pakenham shook it warmly and
then hastened off. The French were attacked directly after.
[Page Head: AN ARMY LOST.]
He also told me another anecdote I had never heard before. During
the retreat from Burgos, on this very day twenty-six years ago,
when the weather was dreadful and the roads were nearly
impassable, the Duke _lost his army_ for several hours. They had
to cross a river near a place called Rodrigo, and the Duke had
ordered the army to march in three columns, of which one,
composed of the Spaniards, was to cross by the only bridge there
was, and the other two by fords and by another route. He had
assigned the easiest line to the Spaniards because they were
likely to have more stragglers than the British. Arthur Upton,
the Quartermaster-General of one of the divisions, had dined at
head-quarters the night before, and the Duke had sent by him
written orders for the march. The next morning at two o'clock the
Duke was on the high road on purpose to see the troops pass by.
Cavalry came, but no infantry, and to the enquiries the Duke
made, they all replied that they had not seen anything of the
infantry. Presently the Duke galloped off, and Fitzroy having
missed him soon after, set off to see if he could discover what
was become of the infantry. It was not till several hours after
that he joined the Duke, who had at last found out the cause of
the non-appearance of his infantry. The three Generals commanding
the divisions, Clinton, Stewart, and Lord Dalhousie, had thought
fit to disobey his orders, and as a great deal of rain had fallen
in the night, they had settled that it would be better to direct
the whole of the infantry on the bridge instead of moving them by
the roads prescribed by the Duke, and though they knew he was
only seven or eight miles off, they never advised him of their
having made this change in the movements he had ordered. The
enemy did not discover what had occurred; if they had, the
consequences might have been very serious, and a great loss have
ensued. Fitzroy asked the Duke what he had said to them, and he
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account