The Greville Memoirs, Part 2 (of 3), Volume 1 (of 3): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1837 to 1852Greville, Charles
History
The Greville Memoirs, Part 2 (of 3), Volume 1 (of 3): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1837 to 1852
Greville, Charles
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901
It was speedily known all over the town that the whole thing was
at an end, and nothing could surpass the excitement and amazement
that prevailed. The indignant Tories exclaimed against intrigue
and preconcerted plans, and asserted that she refused to part
with _any_ of her Ladies, and that it was only a pretext to break
off the Tory Government; while the Whigs cried out against
harshness and dictatorial demands, and complained that it was
intended to make a thorough clearance, to strip her of all her
friends, and destroy her social comfort. The Radicals, who had
for the most part been terribly alarmed at the results of their
own defection, instantly made overtures to the Whigs; and I heard
at Brooks's that Ward had come over from the Reform Club, and
proposed a reconciliation without any concession, except that
Ballot should be made an open question. There appeared no
disposition to concede anything to the Radicals, who, they were
convinced, would join them without any conditions.
In the meantime Lord Melbourne and Lord John Russell went to the
Queen, who told them her whole story. I met the latter coming
from her; he said, 'I have just been for an hour with the Queen;
she told me her story, and ended by saying, 'I have stood by you,
you must now stand by me.' They thought her case a good one,
and resolved to stand by her. Such was the state of things and
such the case as reported to me by several members of the Whig
party yesterday morning, and my impression was that Peel had been
unreasonable in his demands and impolitic in breaking off the
negotiation on such grounds. Nevertheless I had some misgivings,
because I thought the Duke of Wellington unlikely to concur in
any proceeding harsh towards the Queen, or ill-considered in a
political sense; but the assertion was at the same time so
positive, that Peel had required the dismissal of _all_ the
ladies, and the Tories defended instead of denying this, that I
did not doubt the fact to have been so; and moreover I was told
that Peel's behaviour had created a strong sentiment of dislike
towards him in the Queen, and from her representations and the
language of her letter it was clear the impression on her mind
was that no consideration was intended to be shown to her
feelings and wishes, but, on the contrary, that they meant to
abuse their power to the utmost. At the ball last night I put the
question directly to Lord Normanby and Ben Stanley, and they both
declared that the Queen's understanding was that the demand for
power to dismiss the Ladies was unqualified by any intimation of
an intention not to exercise that power to the utmost extent;
that she believed they were _all_ to be taken from her, and under
this impression she had sent her ultimatum by which the whole
thing was terminated. But I had afterwards a conversation with
Lord Wharncliffe, who gave me an account of all that had passed,
placed the matter in a very different light, and proved beyond a
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account