The Greville Memoirs, Part 2 (of 3), Volume 1 (of 3): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1837 to 1852Greville, Charles
History
The Greville Memoirs, Part 2 (of 3), Volume 1 (of 3): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1837 to 1852
Greville, Charles
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901
domineering insolence of the King, and that when they thought it
right to require the apartments, they ought to have gone through
with it, and have taken no denial. It was a gross insult to the
Queen to refuse to give up to her an apartment in her own palace,
which she desired to dispose of; and they were very wrong in
permitting such an affront to be offered to her. So Duncannon was
himself of opinion; but Melbourne, who is all for quietness,
would not allow matters to proceed to extremities, and preferred
knocking under--a mode of proceeding which is always as
contemptible as it is useless. The first thing is to be in the
right, to do nothing unbecoming or unjust, but with right and
propriety clearly on your side, to be as firm as a rock, and,
above all things, never to succumb to insolence and presumption.
[3] [Lord Duncannon was at this time First Commissioner of
Works, and the arrangements with reference to the Royal
Palaces fell within his department.]
[4] The Duchess, for particular reasons, objected to going
back to Kensington.
We had M. Guizot at dinner.[5] They all say he is agreeable, but
I have not been in the way of his talk. He is enchanted and
elated with his position, and it is amusing to see his
apprehension lest anybody should, either by design or
inadvertence, rob him of his precedence; and the alacrity with
which he seizes on the arm of the lady of the house on going out
to dinner, so demonstrative of the uneasy grandeur of a man who
has not yet learnt to be familiar with his own position. With
reference to diplomatic rank, I only heard last night, for the
first time, that the Duke of Sutherland had, some time ago,
addressed a formal remonstrance to Palmerston, against Foreign
Ministers (not Ambassadors) having place given them at the Palace
(which means going first out to dinner over himself _et suos
pares_), a most extraordinary thing for a sensible man to have
done, especially in such high favour as his wife and her whole
family are. He got for answer, that Her Majesty exercised her own
pleasure in this respect in her own palace. The rule always has
been that Ambassadors (who represent the persons of their
Sovereigns) have precedence of everybody; Ministers (who are only
agents) have not; but the Queen, it appears, has given the _pas_
to Ministers Plenipotentiaries, as well as to Ambassadors, and
ordered them to go out at her dinners before her own subjects of
the highest rank.[6]
[5] [M. Guizot had just been appointed French Ambassador in
London under the Government of M. Thiers, who took
office on the 1st March of this year.]
[6] [It was afterwards settled by Her Majesty that Foreign
Ministers should take precedence _after_ Dukes and
before Marquesses.]
April 3rd, 1840 {p.282}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account