The Greville Memoirs, Part 3 (of 3), Volume 2 (of 2): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1852 to 1860Greville, Charles
History
The Greville Memoirs, Part 3 (of 3), Volume 2 (of 2): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1852 to 1860
Greville, Charles
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901
First Lord of the Treasury Earl of Derby
Lord Chancellor Lord Chelmsford
Lord President Marquis of Salisbury
Lord Privy Seal Earl of Hardwicke
Chancellor of the Exchequer Mr. Disraeli
Home Secretary Mr. Walpole
Foreign Secretary Earl of Malmesbury
Colonial Secretary Lord Stanley
War Secretary Colonel Peel
Board of Control Earl of Ellenborough
Board of Trade Mr. Henley
Duchy of Lancaster Duke of Montrose
Admiralty Sir John Pakington
Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland Earl of Eglinton
Chief Secretary Lord Naas
Woods and Forests Lord John Manners]
[Sidenote: LORD DERBY'S ADMINISTRATION.]
_March 2nd._--Last night Derby made his statement. He was very nervous
and unlike himself, scarcely audible at first, much less fluent than
usual, and he spoke from notes, which I never saw him do before.
It was, however, a very judicious and becoming speech. Granville
and Clarendon both spoke very well, and the whole affair was very
creditable and satisfactory, civil, courteous, and good-humoured on
all sides. Clarendon made a very plausible defence of his own conduct
in not answering Walewski's despatch, which was so good that Hardwicke
crossed the House to compliment him, and said if that speech had been
made in the House of Commons there would have been no division. The
impression left on me is that though it was a pretty good defence, he
would have exercised a sounder discretion if he had sent an answer, and
that there was no difficulty in doing so. Clanricarde has given notice
of what the 'Times' calls favouring the House with some leaves of his
autobiography. He has been advised to take this course by some of his
friends and colleagues, particularly Lord Lansdowne; but in spite of
such respectable authority, I think it an ill-advised step, from which
he is likely to derive little if any benefit. He is going to defend
himself against something intangible, for no accuser will appear, and
there is no charge which he is called upon to rebut. No doubt his
appointment has been the real cause of the downfall of the Government.
It is this which ruined the popularity of Palmerston. It is only fair
to admit that they could not have been expected to anticipate all the
hubbub it made, nor anything like it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account