The Greville Memoirs, Part 3 (of 3), Volume 2 (of 2): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1852 to 1860Greville, Charles
History
The Greville Memoirs, Part 3 (of 3), Volume 2 (of 2): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1852 to 1860
Greville, Charles
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901
_London, September 26th._--I stayed three days at Jervaulx, then
to Doncaster, Bretby, and to town. All the Ministers in London,
having passed their lives during the last fortnight in the railway
or in Cabinets, which have been very numerous, as well they may,
for they have plenty to occupy them in the Italian, Chinese, and
American questions, all, in their several ways and degrees, extremely
embarrassing. I have not the slightest conception what our Government
are doing about the Italian question, but I suppose trying to keep well
with Napoleon III., and to obtain good terms for the Italian Duchies.
At present it looks as if a Congress would be got together to untie
this complicated knot, but I fear we are not likely to play in it a
part which will be consistent with our principles, or creditable to our
national character, and I wish we could abstain from having anything to
do with it. The incident about the American Boundary is awkward, but I
feel confident it will be amicably settled.
[Sidenote: DISPUTES WITH CHINA.]
The Chinese affair is the most serious, and one can see no solution of
it that is not full of objections and embarrassments.[1] In the first
place it looks at present very much as if our case was a bad one. We
had no business to go with an armament and force our way up the river,
and even if we were upon any ground justified in such an extreme
measure, it was to the last degree impolitic and unwise to exercise
such a right. The object for which Bruce was sent to China was to
conclude a peace, and to establish amicable relations with the Chinese
Government, and it might have occurred to him that the employment of
force, even if it was ever so successful, must infallibly defeat his
object. It required no great sagacity to perceive that the arrival at
Pekin of a victorious Ambassador, who had forced his way to the capital
at the head of an imposing force, would not serve to make his reception
a friendly one, or to establish permanent harmonious relations between
the English and the Chinese Governments. As long as there was a
possibility of procuring access to Pekin by peaceful means and by
negotiation, it would have been better to be patient and to wait any
time than to employ force; and besides the political objections that
seem conclusive against the adoption of such a course, it seems highly
probable that no such force as that which we employed on this occasion
could have been pushed on into the heart of the country without
imminent danger of its being cut off and eventually destroyed. The
mere fact of destroying again the Peiho forts would be deemed by the
Chinese as the renewal of the war, and the perpetrator of the outrage
would not have been received in the sacred character of an Ambassador,
but would have been looked on as an invader, and treated accordingly.
This is the first view of the question which presents itself. Then
comes that of vindicating our honour, and retrieving the disaster we
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account