The Greville Memoirs, Part 3 (of 3), Volume 2 (of 2): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1852 to 1860Greville, Charles
History
The Greville Memoirs, Part 3 (of 3), Volume 2 (of 2): A Journal of the Reign of Queen Victoria from 1852 to 1860
Greville, Charles
Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901
_May 9th._--A correspondence appears in the newspapers between Lord
Grey and John Russell, couched in terms of no small bitterness. Such a
correspondence between men of such eminence and of the same political
colour shows up to the world the insincerity with which, for political
motives at the time urgent, they have spoken in their places in
Parliament. It is no new thing that members of the same Cabinet should
often differ, and that vehemently on particular questions, and yet when
these questions come under Parliamentary discussion, that they should
exhibit to the world the semblance of an agreement and concurrence
which is remote from the truth. But though this is well understood to
be of not unfrequent occurrence, and sooner or later the details of
the truth often leak out, it is much to be regretted that men should
exhibit themselves and each other in the way which this correspondence
does, for such exhibitions cannot fail to excite suspicions of the
sincerity, conscientiousness, and truth of public men. When Governments
are entirely of one party colour, either wholly Whig or wholly Tory,
and when they are presided over by some man of supereminent authority,
such differences and consequent difficulties are not likely to happen
often; but as of late years parties have been broken up, and composite
Governments have been formed, combining men of the most opposite
original principles, and imbued with very different and incompatible
opinions on various subjects, it must be continually happening that
candid discussions and disputes in the Cabinet should be followed by
insincere and untruthful declarations and argumentations in public. The
understood practice from time immemorial has been, that a dissentient
from the general opinion of his colleagues upon any _important_
question must either consent to merge his own opinion in theirs,
or retire from office; and then the conduct of the dissentient was
regulated by his view of the _importance_ of the matter at issue. Of
course if a man were to break off from his colleagues upon every matter
of difference, however small, no Government could possibly go on for
many months or perhaps weeks, but it is impossible in these days not
to be struck with the fact that so many men are indisposed to consider
anything of sufficient importance to resign their offices rather than
sacrifice their enlightened consciences and mature judgements.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account