See MS. Bodl. Digby 216, f. 40, containing three theological questions to which the name ‘Ratforde’ is prefixed; the MS. dates from the fourteenth century: the questions are: ‘_an quilibet adultus teneatur laudare Deum; utrum ex sui meriti vel demeriti circumstantiis juste debeat augeri vel minui pena; utrum ad omnem actum creature rationalis concurrat necessario Dei efficientia specialis._’ 52. =John de Preston=[1162]. 53. =Walter de Chauton=[1163] is no doubt identical with =Walter de Chatton=, who with the warden was summoned to appear in the Mayor’s Court, to answer a charge, brought against the convent, of wrongfully keeping two books, in 1330[1164]; he evidently held some official position at this time, presumably that of regent master. He is said to have been warden of Norwich, probably his native convent, and to have taught theology there[1165]. He was one of the D.D.’s whom Benedict XII consulted in drawing up his Statutes for the Franciscan Order in 1336[1166]. This fact lends some support to Bale’s statement that he became papal penitentiary and died at Avignon in 1343[1167]. Bartholomew of Pisa mentions him among the famous writers of the Order; William of Woodford among those who entered the Order in their youth, and ‘wrote many works of great wisdom[1168].’ _Cathon sur les Sentences_ [W. Chatton[1169] or R. Cowton?]. MSS. Paris:--Bibl. Nat. 15886, 15887 (sec. xiv), two copies. _Questio fratris Galtheri magistri ... de schaton, que est secunda in ordine primi sui in prologo._ _Inc._ ‘Utrum Deus possit creare.’ _Expl._ ‘Et ideo non est simile.’ MS. Cambridge:--Public Library, Ff. III, 26, f. 122, 123, 130 b. Cf. MS. Harl. 3243, fol. 55, _Adam Wodham de divisione, etc. contra Chatton_. 54. =John de Ridevaus=, =Rideval=, or =Redovallensis=, sometimes called John de Musca, according to Bale[1170], flourished about 1330. Of the works attributed to him, the Commentary on Fulgentius seems to be the same as that attributed to John Wallensis; similarly perhaps with the commentary on the letter of Valerius to Rufinus; the moral exposition of the Metamorphoses seems to differ from that ascribed to Thomas Walleys and Peter Bercherius. _Lectura super Apocalypsi._ MS. Venice:--St. Mark, Class. I, Cod. 139, fol. 110-119 (sec. xiv), ‘Extracta de lectura fratris Joannis Rydelbast super Apocalypsi, ordinis Minorum.’ ‘_Commentarius super Fulgencium continens picturas virtutum et viciorum sub ymaginibus deorum et dearum quos colebat vana superstitio paganorum editus a fratre J. de Ridevall de ordine fratrum minorum._’ _Inc._ ‘Intencio venerabilis viri Fulgencii.’ MSS. Cambridge:--Pub. Libr. Ii II, 20, f. 121-162 (sec. xv); and Mm I, 18, § 6 (xv). Worcester Cathed. Libr. 154 (= Bernard 829). Venice:--St. Mark, Class. I, Cod. 139, f. 121-136 (xiv). ‘_Ovidii Metamorphoseos fabule ccxviii moraliter exposite._’ _Inc._ ‘In hujus expositionis initio.’