The Grey Friars in OxfordLittle, A. G. (Andrew George)
History
The Grey Friars in Oxford
Little, A. G. (Andrew George)
Franciscans -- Great Britain
As far as the bulk of the Franciscan Order was concerned, the controversy
on ‘Evangelical Poverty’ was purely a theoretical one[518], its ultimate
importance rather accidental than real. The claim to ‘this perfitnesse,’
as Daw Topias contemptuously calls it, rested not on fact but on a legal
construction. The friars had only the use, not the proprietorship, of
their lands and houses and goods. John XXII by his bull, ‘_Ad conditorem
canonum_,’ issued on the 8th of December, 1322, and declaring that use was
inseparable from proprietorship, withdrew from the Order the right of
holding property in the name of the Roman See, and thus went far to
destroy its theoretical claim to precedence. The whole Order, instead of
the party of the _Spirituales_ merely, was for a time banded against the
Pope; and the dispute about a legal quibble became transformed under the
hands of Ockham into an examination of the position and claims of the
Papacy, and of the whole relation of Church and State.
Ockham probably studied at Oxford in his younger days, but it was no doubt
later in life, and under the influence of Marsilius of Padua, that he
developed the doctrines which made him ‘at once the glory and the reproach
of his Order[519].’ In philosophy he had many followers at Oxford in the
fourteenth century, and the Franciscan Convent was, like the rest of the
University, divided on the questions of Nominalism and Realism[520]. The
dispute concerning the poverty of Christ was not allowed to rest. It was
this discussion which first brought the Archbishop of Armagh into open
hostility to the friars[521]; and Wiclif mentions the controversy as
being still carried on between the two Orders in his time.
‘Prechours seyn þat Crist hadde hiȝe shone as þei have; ffor ellis
wolde not Baptist mene þat Crist hadde þuongis of siche schone.
Menours seyn þat Crist went barfote, or ellis was shood as þei ben,
for ellis Magdalene shulde not have founde to þus have washid Cristis
feet[522].’
A great historian has said of the Middle Ages, that ‘at no time in the
world’s history has theory, pretending all the while to control practice,
been so utterly divorced from it[523].’ An extract from the Patent
Rolls[524] will afford a striking illustration of the truth of these words
as far as the learned Franciscans, the professors of evangelical poverty,
are concerned. The date is February 22nd, 1378; the writ is issued in the
King’s name.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account