The Grey Friars in OxfordLittle, A. G. (Andrew George)
History
The Grey Friars in Oxford
Little, A. G. (Andrew George)
Franciscans -- Great Britain
At Oxford the seculars, always numerically strong and jealous of the
regulars, rallied to Wiclif’s standard; while the Mendicants roused the
anger of the University by appealing to external authority. The friars
were accused of having made use of their position as confessors to stir up
the peasant revolt. On the 18th of February, 1382, the heads of the four
Mendicant Convents at Oxford sent a letter to John of Gaunt, denying the
charge and begging his protection[548]; all evils were attributed to them,
and their lives were in danger. Their chief enemy was Nicholas Hereford.
In Lent of the same year Hereford preached a University sermon at St.
Mary’s, in which he argued that no ‘religious’ should be admitted to any
degree at Oxford[549]. He was appointed by the Chancellor to deliver the
principal English sermon of the year at St. Frideswide’s Cross on
Ascension Day (May 15th), and used the opportunity to attack monks and
friars and mendicancy in general[550]. On the 19th of the same month, the
‘Council of the Earthquake’ met at the Blackfriars in London, and
condemned ten of Wiclif’s conclusions as heretical and fourteen as
erroneous; among the seventeen doctors of divinity who took part in the
council were four Minorites, the Oxford Franciscans being represented by
Hugo Karlelle and Thomas Bernewell[551]. The Archbishop sent Peter Stokes,
a Carmelite, to publish the condemnation at Oxford. The Chancellor and
Proctors resented this interference with their rights, and the general
feeling was strong in Wiclif’s favour. Stokes and his brethren went in
fear of their lives; when the Carmelite ‘determined’ against Philip
Repyngdon on the 10th of June, men were seen in the schools with arms
concealed under their clothes. At length, on June 15th, the Chancellor was
compelled, by the King’s command, to publish the condemnation of the
twenty-four conclusions;
‘and he thus so roused the seculars against the religious that many of
the latter feared death, the seculars crying out that they wanted to
destroy the University, though really they (the religious) only
defended the cause of the Church[552].’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account