World War, 1914-1918 -- Personal narratives, British
At Albert we found them, specimens of them, wedged in the line with
our infantry, learning the game. Their one desire was to go out into
No Man’s Land and get to close quarters. They brought Brother Boche
or bits of him every time. One overheard talk on one’s way along the
trenches to the O.P. “Danger?” queried one sarcastically, “Say, I
ain’t bin shot at yet.” And another time when two officers and I had
been shelled out of the O.P. by a pip-squeak battery to our extreme
discomfort and danger, we came upon a great beefy American standing
on the fire step watching the shells burst on the place we had just
succeeded in leaving. “If that guy don’t quit foolin’ around with
that gun,” he said thoughtfully, “some one’ll likely get hurt in a
minute.”
Which was all to the good. They shaped well. The trouble apparently
was that they had no guns and no rifles.
Our own positions were another instance of the criminal folly of
ignorance,--great obvious white gashes in a green field, badly
camouflaged, photographed and registered by the Hun, so placed that
the lowest range to clear the crest was 3,500 and the S.O.S. was
3,550. It meant that if the Germans advanced only fifty yards we
could not bring fire to bear on them.
The dawn of our getting in was enlivened by an hour’s bombardment
with gas and four-twos. Every succeeding dawn was the same.
Fortunately it proved to be a peace sector, comparatively speaking,
and I moved out of that unsavoury spot with no more delay than was
required in getting the Colonel’s consent. It only took the death
of one man to prove my point. He was a mere gunner, not even on
proficiency pay, so presumably it was cheap knowledge. We buried him
at midnight in pouring rain, the padre reading the service by the
light of my electric torch. But the Colonel wasn’t there.
From the new position so reluctantly agreed to, we fired many
hundreds of rounds, as did our successors, and not a single man
became a casualty.
What is the psychology of this system of insisting on going into
childishly unsuitable positions? Do they think the Battery Commander
a coward who balks at a strafed emplacement? Isn’t the idea of field
gunners to put their guns in such a place as will permit them to
remain in action effectively for the longest possible time in a show?
Why, therefore, occupy a position already accurately registered by
the enemy, which he can silence at any given moment? Do they think
that a Major of two years’ experience in command of a battery in the
line has not learned at least the rudiments of choosing positions for
his guns? Do they think it is an attempt to resent authority, or to
assert their own importance? Do they think that the difference of one
pip and a foot of braid is the boundary between omniscience and crass
stupidity?
In civil life if the senior partner insists on doing the junior’s job
and bungles it, the junior can resign,--and say things.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account