The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology: With Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and CharacterMcDougall, William
Science
The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology: With Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and Character
McDougall, William
Ethnopsychology; National characteristics; Social psychology
The churches and the universities alike illustrate vividly the
principles of a group within a group. Each of the older universities is
a microcosm, a small model of the national life, and largely to this
fact is due its educational value as a place of residence. Each college
evokes a strong group spirit in all its members; and this sentiment for
the college, though it may and does in some minor matters conflict with
the sentiment for the university, is in the main synthesised within
this, and indeed is the chief factor in the strength of that sentiment.
The group spirit of each college owes much of its strength to the
carefully fostered, but perfectly friendly, rivalry between the several
colleges in sports and studies and other activities. The close
companionship and emulation between a number of small communities of
similar constitution and purpose, each having a long and distinct
tradition as well as a clearly defined material habitat which embodies
and symbolises its traditions in a thousand different ways, has raised
the self-knowledge and sentiment of the groups to a high level. It is
well known that the few years spent in one of the colleges develops in
every member (with few exceptions) a sentiment of attachment that
persists through life and extends itself in some degree to every other
member, past, present and future; so that, in whatever part of the world
and under whatever circumstances two such men may meet, the discovery of
their common membership of the college at once throws them into a
friendly attitude towards each other and prepares each to make
disinterested efforts on behalf of the other.
The same is true in a less degree of the universities themselves. Oxford
and Cambridge have, partly in consequence of their proximity and close
intercourse, developed on closely parallel lines. They are therefore so
similar in constitution and aims as to be keen though friendly rivals.
This has been of great benefit to both, the self-knowledge and group
sentiment of each having been greatly promoted by this close
intercourse, rivalry, and reciprocal criticism. And this rivalry has not
prevented the growth of some sentiment for the larger group constituted
by the members of both universities, each of whom is always ready to
defend the common interests of the larger group against the rest of the
world.
Again, within each college there are numerous smaller groups, each with
its traditions and group spirit; and, so long as these groups do not
become too exclusive, do not absorb all the devotion of their members,
but leave each one free to join in the life of other minor groups, their
influence is good, the group spirit of each such minor group
contributing to the strength of the larger group sentiment and enriching
the spiritual life of the whole.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account