The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology: With Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and CharacterMcDougall, William
Science
The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology: With Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and Character
McDougall, William
Ethnopsychology; National characteristics; Social psychology
It is an interesting question—When two races or subraces are crossed, do
they ever produce a homogeneous and true subrace, exhibiting a true and
stable blend of the qualities of the parental stocks? Or does the blend
always remain imperfect, with many individuals in whom the qualities of
one or other of the parental stocks predominate? The answer seems to be
that a stable subrace may be formed in this way, though usually not
until free intermarriage has gone on for many generations. According to
the most recent doctrine of heredity, the Mendelian, every human being
is a mosaic or patchwork of unit qualities, organs, or capacities, each
of which is inherited wholly from one of the parents and not at all from
the other. If this view is well founded, it follows that there can be no
true blending of these unit qualities. But still the mosaic may be so
finely grained and the unit qualities derived from the two parents so
closely interwoven, that each individual may present an intimate mixture
of the parental qualities, may represent for all practical purposes a
blending of the two stocks.
CHAPTER XVIII
RACIAL CHANGES DURING THE HISTORIC PERIOD
We have found reason to believe that national character, as expressed in
the collective mental life of any people, is only to be understood and
explained when we take into account the native or racial mental
qualities of the people; and we have seen reason to think that these
racial qualities were in the main formed in the prehistoric or
race-making period; we have noted some of the principal attempts to
throw light on the prehistoric moulding of races. But these racial
qualities, although very persistent, are not unalterable. We must,
therefore, consider whether, and in what ways, the racial mental
qualities of a people may have been changed during the nation-making or
historic period. What are the factors which determine such changes? What
is their influence on the destiny of nations?
The most diverse opinions are still held in regard to the question of
the extent and nature of changes of innate mental qualities of peoples
during the historic period, the period during which a people, or a
branch of a people, attains political unity and becomes a nation.
There is no doubt that the moulding power of physical environment tends
to become greatly diminished during this more settled period of the life
of a people, and that, in so far as changes take place, they are
determined principally by racial substitutions and by social selections
within a people, rather than by the mere struggle for survival of
individuals or of family groups against the inclemency of nature or
against other individuals and groups.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account