The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology: With Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and CharacterMcDougall, William
Science
The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology: With Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and Character
McDougall, William
Ethnopsychology; National characteristics; Social psychology
Without raising the question of the natural or supernatural origin of
religion or of any particular religion, we may say that from the point
of view of national life, a religion is essentially a system of
supernatural sanctions for social conduct, for conduct conforming to the
moral code of the society, and especially for customs regulating the
family and the relations of the sexes, on which, more than on anything
else, social stability depends. It is, thus, the great conservative
agency; for it enforces the observance of custom by a system of rewards
and punishments; in the earlier stages of society, especially by
punishments. It is essentially intolerant of change of custom or belief;
and even the Christian religion has exemplified this principle in the
terrible persecutions and innumerable wars for which it has been
responsible.
The great function and tendency of any religion, once established among
a people, is to preserve intact the current moral code and to secure
conformity to it. Nevertheless, some religions are less prohibitive of
progress than others; and, when such a religion replaces a more
restrictive one, an important condition of progress is realised. But, in
so far as progress is then favoured, this is not due to the changed
operations of the religious emotions and sentiments; it is due to the
great religious teachers who have succeeded in breaking down the bonds
imposed by the more primitive religion, and so have given freer play to
the intellectual faculties; the improvements of religious systems have
been negative or permissive conditions of progress, rather than its
effective cause.
Progress has, then, always resulted primarily from the gains made by the
intellect and added to the intellectual tradition, that is to say, from
the progress of knowledge. Nevertheless, the free play of the intellect
is always a danger to society, for the reason that the customs and moral
code of a society, however imperfect and sanctioned by a religion
however narrow, are yet the bonds by which alone it can be held
together; to their influence has been largely due in every age the
subordination by the members of a society of their individual egoistic
ends to the welfare of the society as a whole.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account