The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology: With Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and CharacterMcDougall, William
Science
The Group Mind: A Sketch of the Principles of Collective Psychology: With Some Attempt to Apply Them to the Interpretation of National Life and Character
McDougall, William
Ethnopsychology; National characteristics; Social psychology
I think we must accept this view of the importance of the direct action
of physical environment on the minds of individuals. To deny, as Hegel
did, the important influence of physical environment upon the
development of Greek culture, because the Turks have enjoyed a similar
climate without producing a similar culture, is unreasonable. The
progress of civilisation has always been the result of a multiplicity of
causes and conditions; and we cannot deny all importance to any one,
whether race or climate or social organisation or religion or any other,
because in some particular instance it has failed to produce the
progress of which in other instances it has been one of a number of
co-operating causes.
The diversity and small scale of the physical features of South and
Western Europe has favoured the progress of the intellectual tradition
in another important way. The land is divided by natural barriers into a
number of natural territories, the population of each of which has
naturally tended to become one nation and to develop a national culture.
In this way there arose a number of nations and States in close
proximity with one another, yet each developing along its own lines.
When the development of wealth and commerce brought these diversified
cultures into friendly intercourse with one another, the exchange of
ideas and the general imitation of the useful arts of one people by its
neighbours must have made very strongly for progress; the culture of
each of a group of neighbouring peoples no longer progressed only by the
addition of the ideas and inventions of its own exceptional intellects,
but each group had the opportunity of selecting and imitatively adopting
whatever seemed to them best among the ideas, the arts and inventions of
the neighbouring peoples.
It is generally admitted that this was one of the main conditions of the
rapid development of the culture of the ancient Greeks, situated as they
were within easy reach of several of the oldest civilisations, those of
Egypt and of South-Eastern Asia; they were also within reach of a number
of less civilised peoples, and therefore enjoyed opportunities for trade
of a kind which, being peculiarly lucrative, has in all ages hastened
the acquisition of wealth and capital and stimulated the development of
commerce. All the most progressive European peoples have enjoyed similar
advantages; and it has been maintained with some plausibility that the
principal cause of the shifting of the centre of progressive
civilisation from the Eastern Mediterranean to the west of Europe has
been the improvement of the art of navigation and the discovery of the
New World and of the sea route to Asia and the East Indies; for these
gave the western countries the most advantageous positions for the
conduct of a world wide commerce. No doubt the factor mentioned has been
important in producing this change.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account