The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
History
The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800
Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
Medicine -- History
Caelius Aurelianus probably flourished during the third century A. D.
The different authorities, however, do not agree as to the limits of
the period during which he lived; some saying that his career antedated
that of Galen, while others claim that he came upon the scene after
the death of the latter, which occurred early in the third century A.
D. His chief merit appears to have been that, through his translation
of the writings of Soranus into Latin, he placed within reach of the
physicians of Rome the teachings of that admirable diagnostician and
therapeutist; for it must be remembered that the great majority of the
Roman medical men were not able to read Greek. On the other hand,
Caelius Aurelianus, who was himself a thoroughly practical physician,
deserves considerable credit for having enriched the text of his book
with many very appropriate examples (chiefly with regard to questions
of diagnosis) drawn from his own personal experience, which must
have been extensive. During the Middle Ages, as we are informed by
Friedlaender, this work furnished the chief source from which the monks
derived their knowledge about diseases and their proper treatment.
The Latin in which the book is written is described by nearly all the
authorities as barbaric.
_The Pneumatists._--Methodism had been established only a very
few years when Athenaeus of Attalia, a city on the coast of Pamphylia,
Asia Minor, founded (about 50 A. D.) a new sect--that of “Pneumatism.”
He was not the discoverer of the “pneuma” or “vital spirit,” for that
had already been admitted by the earlier schools of philosophy as a
fifth primary creative element, supplementary to the four well-known
substances--fire, air, earth and water. He believed that heat, cold,
moisture and dryness (the primary qualities of these four bodies)
were not the veritable elements of living beings. Heat and cold, he
maintained, were “efficient causes” and moisture and dryness “material
causes.” To these he added “spirit” as a fifth element; and he taught
that this spirit enters into the formation of all bodies and preserves
them in what may be termed their natural state. It was from the
Stoics, more particularly, that Athenaeus borrowed this belief, and
it was the latter fact, as Le Clerc says, which led Galen to speak of
Chrysippus--one of the most famous of the Stoics--as “the Father of the
Sect of the Pneumatists.”
In his application of the doctrine of Pneumatism to the science of
medicine, Athenaeus maintained that the majority of diseases owed their
origin to some disturbance or disorder of the spirit; but it is almost
impossible to understand, from the scanty data which have come down
to us, what Athenaeus really meant by the term “spirit,” and by the
expression “disorder of the spirit.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account