The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
History
The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800
Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
Medicine -- History
According to Neuburger, Aretaeus enters very fully into details
when he discusses the subject of diagnosis; his statements in one
place warranting the belief that he even auscultated the heart. His
methods of treatment were based largely upon his own experience and
were generally of a simple character. He attached great importance,
for example, to a very careful regulation of the diet, muscular
exercise, massage, etc., and his employment of remedies was confined
to a very small number of such drugs as exert a mild action. When the
case, however, was of such a character as to call for more vigorous
interference, he did not hesitate to resort to the use of opium,
emetics, cathartics, venesection, blistering, the red-hot cautery iron,
etc.
Rufus, a native of Ephesus, a city of Asia Minor, about thirty-five
miles from Smyrna, is reckoned by most authorities among the Eclectics;
in other words, he was an independent, or one who adopted from the
teachings of the different sects such doctrines as met with his
approval, but who, at the same time, did not care to pose as the
disciple of any one of them. He received his medical training at
Alexandria, but it is not known where he practiced his profession.
Almost no details concerning his life or his professional career have
come down to our time. It is simply known that he flourished during
the reign of the Emperor Trajan (98–117 A. D.). Ebn Ali, an Arabian
physician and author, says that he was the leading medical authority
of his time and that his works were highly esteemed by Galen. His
treatise on anatomy (entitled “The Names of the Different Parts of the
Human Body”), which is one of the few that have escaped destruction,
is described as a treatise which was written for students, and which
possesses great value for the history of anatomical nomenclature. The
same authority says that Rufus was the first to describe the chiasma,
that he came very near establishing the existence of two different
kinds of nerves--motor and sensory--and that he attributed the control
of all bodily functions to the nervous system. He also states that he
was one of the first to furnish a description of the oriental bubonic
plague. Some idea of Rufus’ style of writing may be gathered from the
following quotations which have been taken from his short treatise
entitled “The Questioning of Patients”:--[37]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account