The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
History
The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800
Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
Medicine -- History
A few years later, Heraclitus of Ephesus, who, like Pythagoras, was
both a philosopher and a practicing physician, taught the doctrine that
all things owe their origin to fire. One is not at all surprised to
learn that he had relatively few followers, for history tells us that
he was both a misanthrope and a slanderer of the medical profession,
as shown by the following saying which is attributed to him: “Next to
physicians the grammarians are the biggest fools in the world.”
Hippocrates attached much importance to the value of experience and
to the necessity of studying disease at the bedside; at the same time
he upheld what is commonly known by the name of humoral pathology--a
doctrine which refers all maladies to some abnormal change in the
humors or fluid portions of the body. His writings also show that he
made full use of the reasoning power. The followers of this great
physician did not form a sect in the ordinary sense of the term; they
were his adherents simply because he was an able diagnostician, a
successful teacher, an excellent therapeutist, a skilful surgeon, a man
of very high moral character,--in short, a great physician. Every sect
which developed in the centuries following his death contained a goodly
proportion of Hippocratists.
Nearly two centuries after the active period of the professional life
of Hippocrates, Erasistratus and Herophilus gathered about themselves
in Alexandria (about 280 B. C.) large groups of followers, who held for
their respective teachers a degree of esteem which amounted, according
to Galen, almost to veneration. As there was little or no antagonism
or lack of harmony between the doctrines taught by these physicians,
the two groups cannot properly be classified among the sects. In
fact, it would be more correct to say that Erasistratus and Herophilus
contributed facts of permanent value to our stock of knowledge rather
than doctrines which might prove highly popular for a few scores of
years, but which would probably in due course of time be set aside as
no longer of value.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account