The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
History
The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800
Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
Medicine -- History
Aulus Cornelius Celsus, called by some the Latin Hippocrates and by
others the Cicero of physicians because of the correctness and elegance
of his Latin and the clear manner in which he puts his thoughts into
words, flourished during the reign of the Emperor Augustus (27 B.
C.-14 A. D.). The date and place of his birth are not known, but it is
generally believed that he was born and received his education at Rome.
The great work which he wrote and upon which he must have been engaged
the larger part of his lifetime was a sort of cyclopaedia, which
bore the title “_Artium libri_,” and in which each department
of knowledge was represented by a separate treatise. It is said that
five books were devoted to agriculture, seven to rhetoric, eight to
medicine, etc.; but all of these treatises, excepting those relating
to the latter science, have been lost or destroyed. It is not certainly
known to which of the professions Celsus belonged, but the very skilful
and judicious manner in which he has culled all that is best from the
medical treatises published before his time, the remarkable knowledge
of technical details which he displays in every part of his own work,
and the fine tone of medical thought which pervades these eight
books, almost compel the conclusion that the author was a very clever
clinician, although probably not a physician who practiced for a money
reward. In no other published treatise is a more perfect picture of the
medical practice of antiquity to be found than that which Celsus gives
us in his work “_De arte medica libri octo_.”
It is not an easy matter to select, from a treatise of several hundred
pages in length, one or two passages of such a character that they may
be accepted as fairly representing the author’s manner of dealing with
medical and surgical questions of practical interest. The two given
below are translations from Védrènes’ version (Paris, 1876), and they
deal, the one with venesection and the other with the proper manner of
arresting hemorrhage from a wound. Both the passages quoted represent
only fragments, as sufficient space for more extensive extracts is not
available.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account