The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
History
The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800
Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
Medicine -- History
In Book XXXIX., 8, 3, Pliny--as quoted by Védrènes--makes the following
remarks:--
Very few Romans have shown an active interest in medical
affairs, and those few speedily found it necessary to pass
themselves off as Greeks. For it is a well-known fact that those
physicians who, without being able to speak Greek, attempted to
build up a practice in Rome, failed to gain the confidence of
their patients, even of those who were not at all familiar with
that language.... When one’s health is the question at issue the
readiness to place confidence in a medical adviser is apt to
diminish in proportion as one’s knowledge of the man increases.
Indeed, medicine is the only art in which one is quite ready
at first to put faith in almost anybody who calls himself a
physician, and that too, despite the acknowledged fact that in
no other circumstances of life is an imposture more fraught with
danger.
English versions of Pliny’s Natural History and of Pliny the Younger’s
Letters have been published in what is known as Bohn’s Libraries.
Pedanius Dioscorides, a native of Anazarba, a small Greek town near
Tarsus in Cilicia, lived about the middle of the first century A. D.
(during the reigns of Nero and Vespasian). From his earliest youth he
took a great interest in botany, and, after reaching manhood, traveled
extensively in the wake of different Roman armies, for the sole purpose
of studying by direct observation the plants of different countries
and of verifying the medicinal virtues which each one was reputed to
possess. In this way he visited, in turn, Greece, Italy, Asia Minor
and perhaps also the southern portion of France (the Narbonaise). He
collected great quantities of specimens of every kind of drug--animal
and mineral substances as well as objects belonging to the vegetable
kingdom; and, wherever it was possible to do so, he wrote memoranda of
the traditions of the natives with regard to the uses and medicinal
effects of these different drugs. After he had completed all these
researches and had gathered together all this vast mass of materials,
he wrote his famous treatise on materia medica--“the most complete,
the best considered, and the most useful work of its kind to be found
anywhere to-day.” (Galen.) It is from this treatise, therefore, says
Dezeimeris, that one can derive the most satisfactory idea of the
early Greek materia medica; but at the same time, he adds, it is not
a book in which will be found a detailed account of the manner in
which the practitioners of that period employed the remedies which he
describes. The same authority calls attention to the great difficulty
which modern physicians often experience in their attempts to identify
the drugs which Dioscorides describes. Le Clerc calls attention to
the fact that the physicians who were contemporaries of Dioscorides
were not in the habit of employing either iron or antimony (called by
them _stibium_) internally.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account