The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
History
The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800
Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
Medicine -- History
But while, on the one hand, the Christian church through the
instrumentality of the monasteries was lending its aid to the
preservation of the sources of medical knowledge, it was, on the other,
doing its best to arrest all further evolution of that branch of
science; not consciously, it must be admitted, but through a mistaken
sense of its duty to God. Thus it came about that the Emperor Justinian
I. (527–567 A. D.), acting under the narrow-minded advice of his
ecclesiastical counsellors, closed the medical schools at Athens and
Alexandria and at the same time withdrew the regular allowance of money
which up to that time had been paid to the state physicians and to
special scholars. A few years later, however (_i.e._, in the early
part of the seventh century A. D.), some of the more highly educated
physicians of Alexandria got together and made the attempt to organize
a school of medicine in that city. A course of lectures was planned
and sixteen of Galen’s works, carefully chosen for the purpose, were
made the basis of the new course of instruction. The books selected
were first carefully edited and simplified, and then commentaries
were added in order that in their final shape these treatises might
be better suited to the uses of students. The invasion of Alexandria
by the Arabs, however, soon put an effectual stop to this promising
attempt to revive Greek medicine.
In this brief sketch I have thus far mentioned only the more direct
effects produced by the new religion upon the evolution of medicine.
The indirect effects, however, were also in some cases of very great
importance. At the beginning of her history there developed in the
Christian church, among her chief men, a strong disposition to quarrel
over dogmas. To apply the term quarrelsomeness to this tendency may
easily convey a wrong impression. It was, more strictly speaking, a
highly developed conscientiousness on the part of men whose minds were
deeply imbued with the idea that they were rendering God a service by
keeping what they believed to be the true and only religion free from
errors of all kinds. It took many centuries to impress the leaders
of the church with the fact that the religion of Jesus Christ, like
the science of medicine or the natural sciences, was capable of
development to an almost indefinite extent; and it is owing to our
appreciation of this important fact that we moderns look with so much
more lenient eyes upon the distressing, not to say cruel, events
of mediaeval ecclesiastical history. At the time of which I am now
writing, however, it was considered highly unchristian--especially
for one holding authority in the church--to believe otherwise than
as her doctrines taught; and accordingly, in the early part of the
fifth century A. D., Nestorius, the Patriarch of Constantinople, was
deposed from his high office by a Council of the church and imprisoned
because he was unwilling to teach the doctrine of the miraculous birth
of Jesus Christ.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account