The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
History
The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800
Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
Medicine -- History
The discovery of America by Christopher Columbus in 1492 owed its
origin in part to the restless spirit of adventure which was abroad
in Spain and Italy at that time, and also, in perhaps still larger
measure, to the hope of gain which might be expected to follow the
discovery of a shorter and more direct route to India. As regards the
attainment of the latter object, the great explorer failed, but his
discovery of a new continent resulted eventually in bringing great
wealth to the rulers of Spain, in stimulating maritime commerce, and in
broadening men’s views with regard to every phase of human activity.
The addition of a few new drugs to the pharmacopoeia was a further
result of some importance. Luther’s efforts to reform the government
and doctrines of the Church undoubtedly gave a great impetus to the
Renaissance and therefore to the growth of the science of medicine.
Men learned to use their reasoning powers with greater freedom, and as
a result our knowledge of the structure of the human body (anatomy)
and of the working of its complicated machinery, both in health
(physiology) and in disease (pathology), made astounding advances. And
it is to the consideration of these fundamental branches of medical
knowledge that we must now turn our attention.
_Early Attempts to Dissect the Human Body._--Already as early as
during the first half of the fourteenth century physicians began to
appreciate the fact that further progress in the knowledge of medicine
was not to be attained otherwise than by a more profound study of human
anatomy than had been made up to that time; and they realized that it
was only by means of actual dissections that this more profound study
might be made. Various influences, however, co-operated to hinder such
study. In the first place, the people at large were thoroughly imbued
with the idea that dissecting a human corpse was an act of desecration,
and consequently it was by no means safe for a physician to do any
work of this character except in the most secret manner. Then, in
addition, it was commonly believed-and this belief persisted even up to
a comparatively recent date--that the bull which Pope Boniface VIII.
issued in 1300--and which declared that whoever dared to cut up a
human body or to boil it, would fall under the ban of the church--was
intended to cover dissections for purposes of anatomical study. The
recent investigations of Corradi, however, show (Haeser, p. 736 of the
third edition) that this bull was not intended to apply to dissections
for scientific purposes, but simply to put an end to the practice of
cutting up human corpses and boiling the separate sections in order to
obtain the bony framework in a condition suitable for transportation
from Palestine to Europe,--a practice which had grown to be very common
among the Crusaders.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account