The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
History
The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800
Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
Medicine -- History
Vesalius may rightly be considered the founder of modern anatomy,
for he was the first to furnish correct information, based on actual
dissections of the human cadaver, respecting quite a large number of
the more important anatomical relations; and by this very act he won
the further credit of having dealt the first effective blow toward the
dethronement of Galen, the man who, next to Hippocrates,--probably even
more than Hippocrates,--had exercised, by his teachings in nearly every
department of medical science, almost despotic sway over physicians
for considerably more than one thousand years. At this distance of
time, it is hard to realize what a startling effect was produced by the
announcement of the discovery of so many errors in Galen’s scheme of
anatomy. Albert von Haller, the great authority on medical literature,
speaks of Vesalius’ book as an “immortal work”; and, although its title
would lead one to suppose that it deals only with the construction of
the human body, an examination of its contents reveals the fact that
it contains in addition quite full information regarding physiology and
pathological anatomy, as well as many details relating to comparative
anatomy. Perhaps the most marvelous thing about this book is the
fact that its author completed his work before he had reached his
twenty-eighth year. It may also interest the reader to learn that,
prior to 1914, the University of Louvain possessed a copy of Vesalius’
great work printed on vellum and illustrated with many drawings in
colors; but I am unable to say whether this beautiful volume did or did
not escape destruction at the hands of the ruthless men who invaded
Belgium during the summer of that memorable year.
[Illustration: FIG. 14. ANDREAS VESALIUS.
(After the portrait by Van Calcar in the Royal College of
Surgeons, London.)
Copied from the reproduction published in the _Nederlandsch
Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde_, Jan. 2, 1915.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account