The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
History
The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800
Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
Medicine -- History
In 1556, complaints having reached the ears of Charles the Fifth to
the effect that the sin of dissecting human corpses was greatly on the
increase, this monarch decided to refer the question to the Theological
Faculty of the University of Salamanca, in the northwestern part of
Spain, for an authoritative opinion. The reply which these broad-minded
theologians sent to the Emperor was most satisfactory. It is reported
to have been expressed in the following words: “The dissection of
human cadavers serves a useful purpose and is therefore permissible to
Christians of the Catholic Church.” This decision did not of course
put an immediate end to the harsh criticisms and petty persecutions of
the bigots; but, as the years went by, it was noted that the work of
scientific research in human anatomy and physiology acquired greater
freedom of action, and it is fair to assume that this result was
largely due to the famous decision to which I have just referred.
Shortly after Vesalius had retired, as stated above, from active
participation in anatomical research work, he was called by Charles the
Fifth to serve him in the capacity of private physician. During this
service, which lasted for several years, he visited, in company with
the Emperor, many of the principal cities of Europe; and then, when the
latter abdicated the throne of Spain,--for Charles was not only Emperor
of the Holy Roman Empire but also King of Spain,--Vesalius became the
private physician of Philip the Second, Charles’ son and successor on
the Spanish throne. This long period is largely a blank in the history
of Vesalius. Toward the end he got into trouble with the Inquisition
and was obliged, as a means of escaping the punishment of death, to
undertake a voyage to the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. While he was
in that city he received an official invitation from the Senate at
Venice to fill the Chair of Anatomy at Padua. He then at once turned
his steps toward Italy, doubtless very happy over the prospect of once
more engaging in anatomical work; but he was shipwrecked on the coast
of the Island of Zante, October 2, 1564. Thirteen days later, before he
had completed his fiftieth year, he died from starvation and exposure.
A memorial tablet was placed in one of the neighboring churches on the
island, and in 1847 his Belgian compatriots erected a suitable monument
to his memory in the city of Brussels.
Admirable as was Vesalius’ treatise on human anatomy, it was soon
discovered that it was deficient in certain particulars. Not a few of
the descriptions, for example, were incomplete, and there were also a
number of parts or organs for which no descriptions whatever had been
provided. Many of these deficiencies were supplied by contemporary
anatomists, nearly all of whom were Italians. First and foremost among
this secondary but yet very important group of laborers in the field of
original research work, the names of Fallopius and Eustachius deserve
to be mentioned.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account