The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
History
The growth of medicine from the earliest times to about 1800
Buck, Albert H. (Albert Henry)
Medicine -- History
It would be a very difficult matter to furnish here, within a limited
space, a reasonably clear exposition of the views held by Hippocrates
with regard to human physiology and pathology. Empedocles, a Greek
physician and high priest of Agrigentum, in Sicily, who was born about
490 B. C., founded a system of philosophy on the theory that the
universe is made up of four elements--fire, air, earth and water; and
he maintained that fire is the essence of life, the other elements
forming the basis of matter. It was upon this system that Hippocrates
founded his own theories of life, death and disease, but he disagreed
with Empedocles in regard to the manner in which the four elements
are united, his own belief being that they form together a genuine
mixture, whereas Empedocles maintains that their union represents
merely a mechanical aggregation of separate atoms. He also held that
these original four elements, to which he gave the names of heat,
cold, dryness and moisture, were represented in the human body by the
following four cardinal fluids or “juices”: blood, mucus or phlegm,
black bile and yellow bile.[25] He maintained, further, that when these
elements are mingled harmoniously so as to produce a state of perfect
equilibrium, health resulted; but that when some deficiency of one or
more of them, or some lack of harmony between them in other respects,
occurs, disease is produced. At a later date, a fifth element--wind or
air (pneuma)--was added to the other four; and when Hippocrates was
unable to account satisfactorily for certain phenomena of disease, he
was wont to refer the phenomenon observed to divine interference.
This brief exposition of the physiological and pathological views
held by Hippocrates, incomplete and superficial as it is, will have
to suffice. Those who wish to acquire a more profound knowledge of
the subject should consult some of the larger treatises like those of
Daremberg, of Max Neuburger, and of Pagel, as well as the sections
devoted to these subjects in the French (Littré) and the German (Fuchs)
versions of the Hippocratic writings. At every step in such a study,
the modern physician will encounter ideas and individual terms which he
will have great difficulty in comprehending; and later on, as he reads
the sections which deal with the more practical matters of the medical
art, he will be astonished to find that Hippocrates was a most acute
and trustworthy observer of the phenomena of disease, a remarkably
clear writer, and a standard-bearer of very high aims.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account