The Growth of the English Constitution from the Earliest TimesFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Growth of the English Constitution from the Earliest Times
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Constitutional history -- Great Britain
For a commentary, see Zöpfl, _Geschichte der deutschen
Rechtsinstitute_, p. 94. See also Allen, Royal Prerogative, 12, 162.
(24) See Norman Conquest, i. 95. The primitive Constitution lasted
longest at the other end of the Empire, in Friesland. See Eichhorn,
_Deutsche Staats-und Rechtsgeschichte_, ii. 265, iii. 158. Zöpfl,
_Geschichte der deutschen Rechtsquellen_, p. 154.
(25) Τὰ ἀρχαῖα ἤθη κρατείτω is an ecclesiastical maxim; rightly
understood, it is just as true in politics.
(26) See my papers on “the Origin of the English Nation” and “the
Alleged Permanence of Roman Civilization in England” in Macmillan’s
Magazine, 1870.
(27) See Schmid, _Gesetze der Angel-Sachsen_, on the words “_wealh_”
and “_wylne_.” Earle, Philology of the English Tongue, 318. On the fact
that the English settlers brought their women with them, see Historical
Essays, p. 36.
(28) On _Eorlas_ and _Ceorlas_ I have said something in the History
of the Norman Conquest, i. 80. See the two words in Schmid, and the
references there given.
(29) On the Barons of Attinghausen, see Blumer, _Staats- und
Rechtsgeschichte der schweizerischen Demokratien_, i. 122, 214, 272.
(30) I cannot at this moment lay my hand on my authority for this
curious, and probably mythical, custom, but it is equally good as an
illustration any way.
(31) This custom is described by Diodôros, i. 70. The priest first
recounted the good deeds of the King and attributed to him all possible
virtues; then he invoked a curse for whatever has been done wrongfully,
absolving the King from all blame and praying that the vengeance might
fall on his ministers who had suggested evil things (τὸ τελευταῖον
ὑπὲρ τῶν ἀγνοουμένων ἀρὰν ἐποιεῖτο, τὸν μὲν βασιλέα τῶν ἐγκλημάτων
ἐξαιρούμενος, εἰς δὲ τοὺς ὑπηρετοῦντας καὶ διδάξαντας τὰ φαῦλα καὶ τὴν
βλαβὴν καὶ τὴν τιμωρίαν ἀξιῶν ἀποσκῆψαι). He wound up with some moral
and religious advice.
(32) Tacitus (Germ. 25) distinguishes “eæ gentes quæ regnantur” from
others. And in 43 he speaks of “erga Reges obsequium” as characteristic
of some particular tribes: see Norman Conquest, i. 579.
(33) On the use of the words _Ealdorman_ and _Heretoga_, see Norman
Conquest, i. 581, and the references there given.
(34) See Norman Conquest, i. 583, and the passages in Kemble and Allen
there referred to.
(35) See Kemble’s Saxons in England, i. 152, and Massmann’s Ulfilas,
744.
(36) See the words _driht_, _drihten_ in Bosworth’s Anglo-Saxon
Dictionary.
(37) To say nothing of other objections to this derivation, its author
must have fancied that _ing_ and not _end_ was the ending of the
Old-English participle. The mistake is as old as Sir Thomas Smith. See
his Commonwealth of England, p. 12.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account