Jewish philosophy -- Early works to 1800; Judaism -- Works to 1900; Philosophy, Medieval -- Early works to 1800
9), which is identical with
“And thy law is within my heart.” For that reason the prophet employed
in this verse the phrase “my bowels are troubled” (and “the sounding of
thy bowels”); the verb hamah is in fact used more frequently in
connection with “heart,” than with any other organ; comp. “My heart
maketh a noise (homeh) in me” (Jer. iv. 19). Similarly, the shoulder is
never used as a figure in reference to God, because it is known as a
mere instrument of transport, and also comes into close contact with
the thing which it carries. With far greater reason the organs of
nutrition are never attributed to God; they are at once recognized as
signs of imperfection. In fact all organs, both the external and the
internal, are employed in the various actions of the soul; some, as
e.g., all inner organs, are the means of preserving the individual for
a certain time; others, as the organs of generation, are the means of
preserving the species; others are the means of improving the condition
of man and bringing his actions to perfection, as the hands, the feet,
and the eyes, all of which tend to render motion, action, and
perception more perfect. Animate beings require motion in order to be
able to approach that which is conducive to their welfare, and to move
away from the opposite; they require the senses in order to be able to
discern what is injurious to them and what is beneficial. In addition,
man requires various kinds of handiwork, to prepare his food, clothing,
and dwelling; and he is compelled by his physical constitution to
perform such work, namely, to prepare what is good for him. Some kinds
of work also occur among certain animals, as far as such work is
required by those animals. I do not believe that any man can doubt the
correctness of the assertion that the Creator is not in need of
anything for the continuance of His existence, or for the improvement
of His condition. Therefore, God has no organs, or, what is the same,
He is not corporeal; His actions are accomplished by His Essence, not
by any organ, and as undoubtedly physical forces are connected with the
organs, He does not possess any such forces, that is to say, He has,
besides His Essence, nothing that could be the cause of His action, His
knowledge, or His will, for attributes are nothing but forces under a
different name. It is not my intention to discuss the question in this
chapter. Our Sages laid down a general principle, by which the literal
sense of the physical attributes of God mentioned by the prophets is
rejected; a principle which evidently shows that our Sages were far
from the belief in the corporeality of God, and that they did not think
any person capable of misunderstanding it, or entertaining any doubt
about it. For that reason they employ in the Talmud and the Midrashim
phrases similar to those contained in the prophecies, without any
circumlocution; they knew that there could not be any doubt about their
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account