Jewish philosophy -- Early works to 1800; Judaism -- Works to 1900; Philosophy, Medieval -- Early works to 1800
When a simple mathematician reads and studies these astronomical
discussions, he believes that the form and the number of the spheres
are facts established by proof. But this is not the case; for the
science of astronomy does not aim at demonstrating them, although it
includes subjects that can be proved; e.g., it has been proved that the
path of the sun is inclined against the equator; this cannot be
doubted. But it has not yet been decided whether the sphere of the sun
is excentric or contains a revolving epicycle, and the astronomer does
not take notice of this uncertainty, for his object is simply to find
an hypothesis that would lead to a uniform and circular motion of the
stars without acceleration, retardation, or change, and which is in its
effects in accordance with observation. He will, besides, endeavour to
find such an hypothesis which would require the least complicated
motion and the least number of spheres; he will therefore prefer an
hypothesis which would explain all the phenomena of the stars by means
of three spheres to an hypothesis which would require four spheres.
From this reason we adopt, in reference to the circuit of the sun, the
theory of excentricity, and reject the epicyclic revolution assumed by
Ptolemy. When we therefore perceive that all fixed stars move in the
same way uniformly, without the least difference, we conclude that they
are all in one sphere. It is, however, not impossible that the stars
should have each its own sphere, with a separate centre, and yet move
in the same way. If this theory be accepted, a number of Intelligences
must be assumed, equal to that of the stars, and therefore Scripture
says in reference to them, “Is there any number of his armies?” (Job
xxv. 3); for the Intelligences, the heavenly bodies, and the natural
forces, are called the armies of God. Nevertheless the species of the
stars can be numbered, and therefore we would still be justified in
counting the spheres of the fixed stars collectively as one, just as
the five spheres of the planets, together with the numerous spheres
they contain, are regarded by us as one. Our object in adopting this
number is, as you have noticed, to divide the influences which we can
trace in the Universe according to their general character, without
desiring to fix the number of the Intelligences and the spheres. All we
wish to point out is this: in the first place, that the whole Creation
is divided into three parts, viz. (1) the pure Intelligences; (2) the
bodies of the spheres endowed with permanent forms—(the forms of these
bodies do not pass from one substratum to another, nor do their
substrata undergo any change whatever); and (3) the transient earthly
beings, all of which consist of the same substance. Furthermore, we
desire to show that the ruling power emanates from the Creator, and is
received by the Intelligences according to their order; from the
Intelligences part of the good and the light bestowed upon them is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account