Jewish philosophy -- Early works to 1800; Judaism -- Works to 1900; Philosophy, Medieval -- Early works to 1800
Second Theory.—The theory of all philosophers whose opinions and works
are known to us is this: It is impossible to assume that God produced
anything from nothing, or that He reduces anything to nothing; that is
to say, it is impossible that an object consisting of matter and form
should be produced when that matter is absolutely absent, or that it
should be destroyed in such a manner that that matter be absolutely no
longer in existence. To say of God that He can produce a thing from
nothing or reduce a thing to nothing is, according to the opinion of
these philosophers, the same as if we were to say that He could cause
one substance to have at the same time two opposite properties, or
produce another being like Himself, or change Himself into a body, or
produce a square the diagonal of which be equal to its side, or similar
impossibilities. The philosophers thus believe that it is no defect in
the Supreme Being that He does not produce impossibilities, for the
nature of that which is impossible is constant—it does not depend on
the action of an agent, and for this reason it cannot be changed.
Similarly there is, according to them, no defect in the greatness of
God, when He is unable to produce a thing from nothing, because they
consider this as one of the impossibilities. They therefore assume that
a certain substance has co-existed with God from eternity in such a
manner that neither God existed without that substance nor the latter
without God. But they do not hold that the existence of that substance
equals in rank that of God; for God is the cause of that existence, and
the substance is in the same relation to God as the clay is to the
potter, or the iron to the smith; God can do with it what He pleases;
at one time He forms of it heaven and earth, at another time He forms
some other thing. Those who hold this view also assume that the heavens
are transient, that they came into existence, though not from nothing,
and may cease to exist, although they cannot be reduced to nothing.
They are transient in the same manner as the individuals among living
beings which are produced from some existing substance, and are again
reduced to some substance that remains in existence. The process of
genesis and destruction is, in the case of the heavens, the same as in
that of earthly beings.
The followers of this theory are divided into different schools, whose
opinions and principles it is useless to discuss here; but what I have
mentioned is common to all of them. Plato holds the same opinion.
Aristotle says in his Physics, that according to Plato the heavens are
transient. This view is also stated in Plato’s Timæus. His opinion,
however, does not agree with our belief; only superficial and careless
persons wrongly assume that Plato has the same belief as we have. For
whilst we hold that the heavens have been created from absolutely
nothing, Plato believes that they have been formed out of
something.—This is the second theory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account