Jewish philosophy -- Early works to 1800; Judaism -- Works to 1900; Philosophy, Medieval -- Early works to 1800
Such chapters will serve as an introduction to
others; they will contain some reference to the signification of a
homonym which I do not wish to mention in that place, or explain some
figure; point out that a certain expression is a figure; treat of
difficult passages generally misunderstood in consequence of the
homonymy they include, or because the simile they contain is taken in
place of that which it represents, and vice versâ.
Having spoken of similes, I proceed to make the following remark:—The
key to the understanding and to the full comprehension of all that the
Prophets have said is found in the knowledge of the figures, their
general ideas, and the meaning of each word they contain. You know the
verse:—
“I have also spoken in similes by the Prophets” (Hosea xii. 10); and
also the verse, “Put forth a riddle and speak a parable” (Ezek. xvii.
2). And because the Prophets continually employ figures, Ezekiel said,
“Does He not speak parables?” (xxi. 5). Again, Solomon begins his book
of Proverbs with the words, “To understand a proverb and figurative
speech, the words of the wise and their dark sayings” (Prov. i. 6); and
we read in Midrash, (Shir ha-shirim Rabba, i. 1); “To what were the
words of the Law to be compared before the time of Solomon? To a well
the waters of which are at a great depth, and though cool and fresh,
yet no man could drink of them. A clever man joined cord with cord, and
rope with rope, and drew up and drank. So Solomon went from figure to
figure, and from subject to subject, till he obtained the true sense of
the Law.” So far go the words of our Sages. I do not believe that any
intelligent man thinks that “the words of the Law” mentioned here as
requiring the application of figures in order to be understood, can
refer to the rules for building tabernacles, for preparing the lulab,
or for the four kinds of trustees. What is really meant is the
apprehension of profound and difficult subjects, concerning which our
Sages said, “If a man loses in his house a sela, or a pearl, he can
find it by lighting a taper worth only one issar. Thus the parables in
themselves are of no great value, but through them the words of the
holy Law are rendered intelligible.” These likewise are the words of
our Sages; consider well their statement, that the deeper sense of the
words of the holy Law are pearls, and the literal acceptation of a
figure is of no value in itself. They compare the hidden meaning
included in the literal sense of the simile to a pearl lost in a dark
room, which is full of furniture. It is certain that the pearl is in
the room, but the man can neither see it nor know where it lies. It is
just as if the pearl were no longer in his possession, for, as has been
stated, it affords him no benefit whatever until he kindles a light.
The same is the case with the comprehension of that which the simile
represents. The wise king said, “A word fitly spoken is like apples of
gold in vessels of silver” (Prov. xxv. 11).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account