The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy FawkesSpink, Henry
History
The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy Fawkes
Spink, Henry
Gunpowder Plot, 1605; Monteagle, William Parker, Baron, 1574 or 1575-1622
[Par. 4]——“Saith that he haith bin at many masses since Easter
last sometimes at the howse of the said Digby sometimes at the
howse of the L: Vaux sometimes at the howse of Mr. Throgmorton
at the howse of Mr. Graunt at the house of Mr. Winter and at the
house of Mr. Lacon in Shropshire and at Shrosbury in an Inn and
at a Castle in the Holte in Denbeghe or Flintshire, and at St.
Wynyfride’s Well in an Inn, from whence the gentlewomen went
barefoote to the said well and in their retourne from the said
well at one Farmer’s howse about 7 miles from Shrosbury, and
from thence to Mr. Lacon’s where they had masse whereat S^{r}
Frauncis Lacon was from thence to Mr. Robert Winter’s and from
thence to Mr. Graunte’s from thence to Deyntree and from thence
to S^{r} Everard Digby at all which places they had masse.[A]
[Footnote A: The reason why the Examiner who took down the
Evidence was particular to inquire about Masses was that for a
priest to say (or offer) Mass was to be liable to a penalty of
200 marks (a mark being 13s. 4d.) _and_ imprisonment for life;
while for a lay person to hear (or assist at offering) Mass was
to be liable to a penalty of 100 marks and imprisonment for
life. To harbour a priest was felony and the penalty was
hanging, but without the cutting down alive, drawing and
quartering. This last was the portion of the priests who, by
remaining in England 40 days, were held _ipso facto_ guilty of
High Treason without proof of the exercise of priestly
functions. This last penalty, of course, rendered unnecessary
the having recourse to the penalty of 200 marks fine _and_
imprisonment for life, since the greater included the less.]
* * * * *
(Endorsed) “27 Nov. 1605.
“Th’examination of Wm. Handy serv^{t} to S^{r} Everard Digby.”
CHAPTER L.
The pilgrim-band numbered about thirty souls, and included Ambrose
Rookwood and his wife in addition to those before mentioned. Ambrose
Rookwood appears to have been sworn in as a conspirator by Catesby and
others in London about ten weeks before the 2nd day of December, 1605, so
that I conclude this must have been very soon after his return from
Flintshire.
Sir Everard Digby was also made a confederate by Catesby alone about this
time, and in the “_Life_” of that well-favoured but misguided knight there
is an admirably-written account of the unhappy enrolment of the ill-fated
young father of the famous cavalier and diplomatist, Sir Kenelm Digby.
It would seem that Father Garnet proceeded to Gothurst with the pilgrims
on their return. But he must have shortly afterwards retraced his steps to
Great Harrowden.
For a fortnight before Michaelmas (11th October, old style) the chief of
the English Jesuits was being harboured at Great Harrowden, the house of
the Dowager Lady Vaux and the young Lord Vaux.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account