The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy FawkesSpink, Henry
History
The Gunpowder Plot and Lord Mounteagle's Letter, Being a Proof, with Moral Certitude, of the Authorship of the Document: Together with Some Account of the Whole Thirteen Gunpowder Conspirators, Including Guy Fawkes
Spink, Henry
Gunpowder Plot, 1605; Monteagle, William Parker, Baron, 1574 or 1575-1622
On the 9th of November Sir Edward Leigh wrote to the Privy Council that
the Wrights were not slain as reputed, but wounded. Not till the 13th was
their death certified by Sir Richard Walsh, High Sheriff of
Worcestershire.——See Gerard’s “_What was the Gunpowder Plot?_” pp. 153,
154.
Whatever was the case with John Wright, it seems clear that the weight of
evidence inclines to show that Christopher Wright did not expire on
Friday, the 8th November, but that he lingered at least a day or two. The
exact day of Christopher Wright’s death, and what became of his remains,
may be ascertained facts hereafter, possibly. At present, they are
unknown.[157]
CHAPTER LV.
Father Garnet did not go nearer London than Gothurst, in Buckinghamshire,
between ten and fifteen miles distant from Great Harrowden.
We know that he was at Gothurst when Catesby was there, on Tuesday, the
22nd of October, one day after the date of the _post scriptum_ mentioned
in the last chapter. Probably the _post scriptum_ of the 21st October was
written at Gothurst and not at Great Harrowden, though the letter itself
of the 4th October undoubtedly was penned at Harrowden, between ten and
fifteen miles distant from Gothurst, as just remarked.
The Honourable Anne Vaux, whose maternal grandfather was Sir Thomas
Beaumont, Master of the Rolls, was a level-headed woman of acute mental
perceptions as well as of great moral ardour and intense spiritual
exaltation.[A]
[Footnote A: The psychologist will have observed that these qualities are
not seldom combined in a certain order of minds. _Cf._, Shakespeare’s
“great wits to madness are near allied”——some thinkers will be inclined to
say.]
Miss Vaux was allied to both Catesby and Tresham, and their words, and
still more their doings, during the few months then last past, had been
not unnoticed by her. She evidently had that strange premonitory
foreboding, that curious sense of swift approaching doom, which have
marked all tragedies written or unwritten since the world began.
Moreover, the large number of cavalry horses in the stables of Norbrook
and Huddington (those places being her fellow-pilgrims’ and her own
places of sojourning when _en route_ for Holywell) had alarmed Anne Vaux’s
imagination. And in reply to the lady’s anxious inquiries she had been
told by her iniquitous, head-strong connections——Catesby and the
rest——that the horses were wanted for the troop of horse whereof Catesby
was to be in charge, with King James’s permission, in aid of the cause of
the Spanish Archdukes in the Low Countries, then still in rebellion
against the Spanish sovereignty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account