It may be objected that Father John Gerard’s relation of the last dying speech and confession of the great Jesuit Priest and Martyr is hostile to the hypothesis that Oldcorne penned the great Letter, “_Litteræ Felicissimæ_.” Gerard’s reported words are these; but, I contend, we have no absolute proof that they are the _ipissima verba_ of Father Oldcorne, though he may have uttered some of these words, and something resembling them in the case of the others.——See Gerard’s “_Narrative_” p. 275. “He declared unto the people that he came thither to die for the Catholic faith and the practice of his function, seeing that they neither had, nor could prove anything against him which, even by their own laws, was sufficient to condemn him, but that he was a Priest of the Society of Jesus, wherein he much rejoiced, and was ready and desirous to give his life for the profession of that faith which he had taught many years in that very country, and which it was necessary for everyone to embrace that would save their souls.[174] _Then being asked again about the treason and taking part with the conspirators_, he protested there again that he never had the least knowledge of the treason, and took it upon his death that he was as clear as the new-born child from the whole plot or any part thereof. Then commending his soul, with great devotion, humility, and confidence, into the hands of God and to the Blessed Virgin, St. Jerome, St. Winifred, and his good Angel, he was turned off the ladder, and hanging awhile, was cut down and quartered, and so his innocent and thrice-happy soul went to receive the reward of his many and great labours.” (The italics are mine.) CHAPTER LXXI. Now, in the first place, it is to be noticed that Father Oldcorne made the special disclaimer of ever having had the least knowledge of the Plot only _after being asked again about the treason and taking part with the conspirators_. My respectful submissions to the judgment of my candid readers, therefore, are these:—— First, that we have no exact, that is, no scientific, proof[175] that Father Oldcorne, as a fact, employed these _precise words_. And, secondly, that, even if he did so employ them, what he meant to convey to his hearers’ mind by the words was, I maintain, that he had no criminal, no traitorous knowledge of the ruthless Gunpowder enterprise; or, in other words, _no guilty knowledge, no knowledge that his King and his fellow-subjects had any right, title, claim, or demand, in Reason, Justice, Equity, or Honour, to obtain or to wring from him_. For “_Qui prior est tempore potior est jure_.” “He who is first in time is the stronger in point of right.” Again; “There is on earth a yet auguster thing, veiled though it be, than Parliament or King.” And that is the Human Conscience, instructed by Truth and Justice. _Her_ rights are invincible and eternally sacred.